Talk:Dark Matter (disambiguation)

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose the current title conveniently displays as (disambiguation), helpful in right hand search box and Google results. Leave as is. But by all means redirect the caps version to the dab page In ictu oculi (talk) 09:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:MALPLACED says that we prefer the term its self if possible without the carifier. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Support per nom and the established guideline. Anyone capitalising "Matter" when doing a search is almost certainly looking for something on the dab page. PC78 (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. Dohn joe (talk) 16:30, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. This is going way too far now. "Dark Matter" clearly refers primarily to the scientific topic. And the trend is increasingly for DIFFCAPS does not apply to title-case/sentence-case distinctions. Absurd nomination.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Ospreys it is possible to distinguish from upper and lower cases and readers bothering to use the upper case shouldn't land on the lower case, this is the whole point of making use of DIFFCAPS to help our readers (and editors) using the title cased version to find what they want in 1 click. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  DIFFCAPS is for cases like MAVEN where it's obvious that the capitalisation is intentional. Sentence case vs title case is a Wikipedia quirk which is simply not reflected in the wider world, and therefore not suitable for DIFFCAPS. It is completely ludicrous to suggest that "Dark Matter" primarily refers to something other than the topic described at dark matter, with respect to long-term significance and common usage. None of the other titles on the disambiguation page come even close.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Nobody is saying that "Dark Matter" (primarily) refers to anything other than the scientific meaning but that it doesn't primarily refer to anything on WP. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per
  WP:PRECISION). -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• I would also point out that the "Dark Matter" title was originally about Dark•Matter until it was moved and redirected. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

talk page or in a move review

. No further edits should be made to this section.