Talk:Drake (musician)/GA1
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 12:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit waror content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are suitable captions:
- A. Images are
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I will get to this review in the next week. If you have time, please consider reviewing an article at
Excellent article, especially for such a well-known celebrity. Couple of notes:
- There are a few unreliable sources (blogs, tweets, imdb/allmusic, reliable sources
- What? Allmusic is a fine source in the way it's being used. IMDB, NY Post, Tweets, and YouTube have been reworked or removed. Noticed the hold was dragging on so I thought I'd pitch a hand to make sure it didn't fail. oops 17:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)]
- What? Allmusic is a fine source in the way it's being used. IMDB, NY Post, Tweets, and YouTube have been reworked or removed. Noticed the hold was dragging on so I thought I'd pitch a hand to make sure it didn't fail.
- Would be nice if the unlinked tours in the Tours section were cited.
Putting this on hold until these very minor issues are resolved. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Source spotcheck—six sources checked, all good. Article passes. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)