Talk:Dune: The Machine Crusade/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Removed the comment: "However, "canoness" is not determined by fans but instead the living heirs to the Dune series." which ended the introduction; that's a bit over the edge for bias as it's essentially just stating the opposing view. They hold the rights to Dune but that's not the same thing.AM2783 17:36, 6 April 2006

Where are all the necessary citations, reviews and response, and development? Things that should be fairly obvious to find for such a book. 71.243.201.210 (talk) 09:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/05/books/best-sellers-october-5-2003.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. — TAnthony^Talk 00:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Cheers.—

:Online 08:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)