Talk:East West Records

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconRock music
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Eastwest1.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of EastWest

Why did Atlantic originally form the label? We know that, at that time (1955) Atlantic published/distributed Jazz, Blues, and R&B/Soul. What formats/genres were intended for EastWest?

The Kingsmen were not Jazz/Blues/R&B/Soul, so I assume EastWest was set up for Rock. But the restarting of the label in the 1990s indicate an interest in R&B/Soul and Hip-Hop with divergences like Pantera and AC/DC. So, how does EastWest of the 1990s compare to Atlantic of the 1990s? Why bring the label out of hibernation?

I already know the answer is because Atlantic had transitioned heavily into Rock & Roll after it's acquisition by Warner Music Group in 1967, but that isn't relflected in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.96.156 (talk) 22:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]