Talk:Egg cell
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Egg cell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject Animals | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
 | Medicine: Reproductive Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | |
 | This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance). | |
 | The contents of the Ovum page were merged into Egg cell on 13 June 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Dsaulsberry.
Above undated message substituted from ]
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2019 and 2 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Djewellw.
Above undated message substituted from ]
All land plants alternate diploid/haploid
- I don't think this is true, many many land plants are polyploid
]How big is an ovum?
The article says an ovum is "visible to the naked eye." That's a good start as far as a qualitative answer to the question... but let's get a quantitative measurement into the article as well. 75.163.155.188 (talk) 02:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Permission to use a copyrighted source
http://imgur.com/a/o8pip -- Permission by the assumed original copyright holder to use text from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02105.x — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.50.203.127 (talk) 14:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, that's not sufficient - you'll need to follow the instructions here in order to confirm that we are able to use the content. Hut 8.5 22:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)]
Is this correct?
"The human ova grow from primitive germ cells that are embedded in the substance of the ovaries. Each of them divides repeatedly to give secretions of the uterine glands, ultimately forming a blastocyst.[3]"
A blastocyst is a fertilized egg, right? So this is not necessarily the end stage of a developing egg.
edit: In addition I have to say the article is quite disappointing and should be rewritten in an expanded form.
LuxMaryn (talk) 19:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Diagram with the haploid nucleus in human oocyte has an error
Hello, the article has a diagram of the "human ovum cell", and it has an error. Mammals do not have the stage when meiosis has ended and fertilization has not occurred yet. Meiotic division does not end till fertilization in mammals, so there should be no haploid nucleus formed. Instead meiotic spindle should be shown close to the membrane, no nuclear membrane should be present. See e.g. this diagram [1] from this article [2].
On the other hand, it could be a non mammal oocyte, but it needs specification. No, on second thought, it can't, because it has very specific for mammals cells surrounding it. So this diagram has an error that can be fixed only by redrawing it. Sorry, I do not know how to fix this error myself.
Additionally this image could be replaced by this one [3]. It is distributed under creative commons license [4], but I don't know how to upload it here.
(2024-04-01): I removed the incorrect image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.174.140.195 (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 22 January 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) samee converse 16:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Egg cell → Ovum – undiscussed merge; ovum by far the more usual name over 6 million hits to egg cell over 1 million; ngrams much higher register for Ovum; ovum used considerably on other pages. Iztwoz (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Iztwoz and Timrollpickering: Oppose More usually called an "egg" than anything else. Timrollpickering (Talk) 14:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Where is this more usual name registering? Google hits are as given in move request.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- The page Egg descibes the egg as resulting from the fertilisation of the ovum.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Where is this more usual name registering? Google hits are as given in move request.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Withdraw - withdraw proposal - having looked again at Google hits (without commas).--Iztwoz (talk) 12:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Eggs contain cells that are not ova. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Life orientation
How to broke Virginia 41.114.166.110 (talk) 18:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
erroneous information re ova formation in adult women
The sources do not support the statement given. Oocytes have formed from stem cells after implantation into rats, but no formation has been observed in adult women. Suggesting to delete that paragraph. 66.131.169.112 (talk) 05:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- I have replaced the paragraph with a more cautious and balanced account based on the ovarian stem cell article. Random person no 362478479 (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)