Talk:Emergency Care Practitioner

Medicine Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

would it be appropriate to split this page into Emergency Care Practitioners UK and Emergency Care Practitioners SA? Tannim101 (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know enough about this to contribute, but am aware that the South Australian Ambulance Service has started using ECPs in the form of SPRINT cars (first response single paramedic intervention) which may be worth some future research

See the official SAAS promotional videos at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSx5yq2KRg8 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ydmzu4r98Q —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefann (talk • contribs) 08:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emergency Care Practitioner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202105548/http://www.bhamb.nhs.uk/ecpDocs/pdf/10_1.pdf to http://www.bhamb.nhs.uk/ecpDocs/pdf/10_1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]