Talk:Eric Lindros trade/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  21:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

   "and helped increase the popularity of hockey in Philadelphia" - link Philadelphia for accessibility

   The lead summarizes the article well, so no issues here

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I couldn't find any issues with this, so I'll be passing. It is very well written and comprehensive for a trade. Nice work JAGUAR  22:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]