Talk:Family support

Sociology Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Disability
Family support is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

I'm not sure what the topic is here. The previous lead had 3 different topics. We need to define one topic and focus the article Bhny (talk) 06:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added a definition which seems to be what the article is about. Bhny (talk) 22:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the topic appears unclear. Although the page has a lot of information, the information could use some more organization and clarity. There were a few sentences that I had a difficult time understanding as well, so those could use some revision.

I appreciated your revision and I will see what I can do to help clarify some of the confusing parts of the article. Sirshadowclone (talk) 01:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A few sentences in the article had some grammatical errors that need to be corrected. Also, it looks like the sources in the article have a need to be updated. For earlier sections of the article, having older sources makes sense, but in the later sections, it would be good to include more recent research that looks into the same concepts. Edmondarroyo (talk) 04:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

….But anyway, this article reads as though it is written by a person either deeply involved in, or at least a very big fan of, this particular social-therapeutic practice. The point is not to argue over its validity, but rather, to present the practice in an unbiased and even-handed way. Genevieve de la Voie Moyenne (talk) 06:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]