Talk:Fantasy (1946 magazine)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 05:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

here
for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (
    lists
    )    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to
    reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism
    ):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )    :

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Most of the changes needed are in the copy section. Almost there. 7-day hold to Mike Christie. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy changes

Lead

  • It might read like a mistake at first blush to think of wartime paper shortages in 1947, two years after war ended. Maybe something like "continuing effects" or "aftermath of" would be appropriate. (The article Rationing in the United Kingdom, incidentally, does not mention when paper rationing ended in the UK after the war.)
    I made this "paper rationing", which is more direct than "paper shortages". I could make it longer but I think in such a short lead it might be overkill -- e.g. "because of paper rationing; the paper shortages caused by World War II were still affecting the publishing business". I'm open to other ways to phrase this if you think "paper rationing" isn't enough. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Publication history

Other notes

  • The references are almost all access-restricted and/or offline. Assuming good faith. The one online available source does check out.
  • There are no images, though it's unlikely anything except a fair-use magazine cover would be germane.
    That was an oversight and I'm glad you mentioned it; I've added a fair-use cover. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sammi, thanks for the review; all done or responded to, I think. I like your comma essay! As I said above, I'm not sure I'm reliable any more on BrEng/AmEng distintions but I've seen some strong opinions about commas at FAC (and elsewhere) and I'll be interested to see if you run into British editors who disagree with some of your points. By the way, do you have any objections to me reviewing more of your TV station articles? I know some editors don't want all their nominations reviewed by the same person. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, go right ahead, @
MOS:SEASONS does suggest that seasons should be uncapitalized in articles for issues of magazines with the specific example of details appeared in Quarterly Review, summer 2015, so I will make this change. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fantasy_(1946_magazine)/GA1&oldid=1105329205"