Talk:Flying Lions Aerobatic Team

This article is written in South African English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	Aviation
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

South Africa Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Flying Lions Aerobatic Team appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 April 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that in 2006, the North American Harvard aircraft? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flying Lions Aerobatic Team.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Ahunt, can you please elaborate on some of the reasons you added that tag? Petebutt and ktr101 both rated this as B-class. Thanks, Nathan121212 (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

B class has nothing to do with whether it is an advertisement. The whole think reads like it was written by the team PR person. It is far too promotional in tone and describes the team members in far too much depth and far too non-neutral language, for instance using first names as if they are pals of the writer. Wikipedia does not use first names after the first mention. It sounds like it came directly from a team airshow press release. The article requires a rewrite. - Ahunt (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I rated this start-class, as there is no way I would have graded it that high (it's way too short for that right now). If anything, it should be stripped down and put back to start-class, but that is just my opinion.

talk) 04:55, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks guys, I will work on it when I get a chance.

Nathan121212 (talk) 10:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]