Talk:Francisco Coimbre/Archive 1

This page is an current talk page .

I'm reviewing the article now, and I'll be posting my review shortly. Noble Story (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Here's my review for the article

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The article is not up to GA-quality in this respect. There are numerous mistakes in grammar and prose (most notably using "on" instead of "in"). It seems to be written by a non-native English speaker (no offense to the editors, but I'm being blunt). The writing has to be improved before it can be promoted.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   This is another aspect in which the article fails. There are many statements that are unsourced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it
   neutral
   ?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

1. Overall: Pass or Fail:

   Usually I put an article on hold and try to help the nominator in correcting the article, but I think the edits are too large here to be done in a short amount of time. Try going back and correcting the prose, and adding citations to statements that need them.

Noble Story (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)