Talk:Glossary of archaeology

Archaeology Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Template

The {{archaeogloss}} template can be used to conveniently link to entries on this list, e.g.:

{{archaeogloss|fieldwork}} → fieldwork

Or:

{{archaeogloss|backfill|backfilled}} → backfilled

Behind the scenes it also adds

semantic markup to help robots read it, or something. Joe Roe (talk) 02:20, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Capitalisation

@Jentacular: I've just noticed that you changed all the entries in the glossary of archaeology to start with an uppercase letter. Can I ask why? The manual of style for glossaries says to start with a lower-case letter. And changing them all has broken a lot of incoming links and redirects to specific entries. – Joe (talk) 07:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please also avoid unnecessarily switching between two accepted spellings of a word (e.g. artefact→artifact [1]). – Joe (talk) 08:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Papua New Guinea Sorry, I was unaware. I'll pay attention to rules. Sorry about that. Jentacular (talk) 22:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]