Talk:Great Norwegian Encyclopedia
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
inactive . |
Norway | ||||
|
Books | ||||
Press release ref
The source labelled "Press release from Kunnskapsforlaget, 16.09.2008", pointing here, brings up an empty page - I suspect they change their URLs. Can someone find a more suitable ref?--92.40.147.48 (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
"Comprehensive"
What does "comprehensive" mean in the first sentence—i.e., how did they quantify it? Number of articles, or what?
Also, that statement definitely needs a reference...both to verify that SNL is the second-most, and that Wikipedia is the most. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 01:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
New publiser has no entry in Brønnøysundregistrene
Since 2010, the encyclopedia has had a new publisher — Norsk nettlesikon.
It seems like they do not have an entry in Brønnøysund Register Centre.
Aren't they supposed to?--85.165.229.54 (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100315160414/http://www.idg.no:80/computerworld/article161387.ece? to http://www.idg.no/computerworld/article161387.ece&f=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.idg.no/computerworld/article161387.ece&f=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
Primary sources and potential COI
Major updates contributed by User: Ebben almost exclusively cite sources published by the encyclopedia itself. I suggest this user clarify potential COI. Henrik Dvergsdal 20:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)