Talk:Groove

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Should there be mutual links from the Groove and Grove disambiguation pages?

There is an ongoing dispute between User:TheTruthiness and User:Dtgriscom about having a link from the Groove disambiguation page to the Grove disambiguation page, and vice-verse, and I would like help resolving this dispute.

On July 23 '12 I came across a link to the Grove disambiguation article in the Groove disambiguation article, saw it as a clear mistake, and deleted it. On this past May 17 TheTruthiness (who had originally inserted the link) reverted my edit without comment. On May 20 I posted to his

MOS:DAB
for Misspellings" in the edits.

I then posted in

MOS:DAB#Misspellings ("Common misspellings should be listed only if there is a genuine risk of confusion or misspelling") and concluded that there is little chance that the two terms will be confused; if they are likely to be confused, then so are Grave, Grieve, Groan, Grub, Grope, Louvre, and several dozen other words. I thus removed the links again; he reverted my edits yet again, adding a comment to my talk page
.

If an edit war hasn't yet started, my re-reverting these edits would clearly start it. I'm about to post in the

Third Opinion page asking for whether Groove and Grove are truly "common misspellings" where "there is a genuine risk of confusion or misspelling." -- Dan Griscom (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

It's a sad fact, but I can truly see that as a common misspelling. Not because people don't know the difference between grove and groove (well, some are that bad at spelling), but mostly because auto-correct and fat fingering small keyboards on mobile devices and whatnot. It really doesn't hurt anything to have the links connecting the two in my opinion. I hope this helps. That being said, the method of communicating TheTruthiness employs could probably use some improvement. Happy editing! Technical 13 (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks: I'll respect your opinions (both of them). -- Dan Griscom (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]