Talk:Hearing conservation program

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jennifer.ruths. Peer reviewers: Rans1717.

Above undated message substituted from

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amk1251908.

Above undated message substituted from

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 7 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ashleykwebb.

Above undated message substituted from

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HunterVegas.

Above undated message substituted from

Jennifer.ruths (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer.ruths, feel free to make contributions as you see fit! Let me know if there is any way I can be of assistance. James Hare (NIOSH) (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first sentence of this section "If engineering controls fail to maintain an 8-hour time-weighted average below 85 dBA, then a hearing protection device (HPD) is required" needs a citation. Mbruce13 (talk) 19:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

D4 47.39.239.191 (talk) 18:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Is there a source that can be cited to show where the information regarding the four general classes of earplugs was found? Amariemurphy (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This section on earplugs is a good opportunity for a visual showing various types of HPD. Consider adding pictures here. GTachenko (talk) 19:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would consider re-wording certain statements within the article that introduce opinion so that it only includes factual information. For example, “Audiometric testing is most important...” ; and “The NRR now has some help.” Amariemurphy (talk) 00:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the section "Audiometric testing program" reference 14 is used for 7 of the 8 citations. I would consider searching for another source of information. NewlandStage5 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence in the "Audiometric testing program" that reads "Audiometric testing is a very important part of a hearing conservation program" may introduce some bias towards the audiometric testing being the most important part of the program. Consider revising to make a more neutral statement. Sisjenni (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to fix some of the grammatical errors, provide a few citations, and rewrite the Noise Reduction Rating section. The graphic used in that section is taken directly from an article and I believe it is plagiarized.MBooth7 (talk) 17:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would consider removing or editing the last sentence in the Employee training and education, "Proper training is imperative since "even with a very modest amount of instruction attenuation performance can be significantly improved."" When adding to wikipedia articles, including quotations is not recommended.

Additionally, it may be beneficial to add a section about resources needed to implement hearing conservation training. Tessa Mannlein (talk) 19:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would consider changing the wording of the sentence "Providing a refresher training when appropriate will ensure retention of this information as well" by exchanging out the word "ensure" with "support". Using "ensure" introduces a bias claim. (Chad.bailey (talk) 19:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC))[reply]

The equipment and administrative controls section appeared to be written persuasively rather than in a non-biased manner. The section alluded to the hierarchy of noise control, but did not go into how engineering and administrative controls fell within that hierarchy. Klafreniere (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Within this section of the article, I would like to add that if a noise screening results in thresholds greater than 80 dBA, then noise sampling will need to occur. Tculbertson2 (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]