Talk:Hurricane Fausto (2008)

Hurricane Fausto of the 2008 Pacific hurricane season reportedly produced hurricane-force winds on Socorro Island despite being 115 mi (185 km) away from the island?
Current status: Delisted good article

This article was nominated for merging with 2008 Pacific hurricane season on 22:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC). The result of the discussion (permanent link) was merged.

Merge?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merged. It's already over a week and this should have been merged by this point before the moratorium discussion had started. Per

9thx my edits 07:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

This hurricane did bring some hurricane-strength winds on Clarion and Socorro islands, but ultimately this is an average non-landfalling East Pacific hurricane. 2008 PHS is also not a GA, so merging this article could help.

9thx my edits 22:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)\[reply

]

Support Two nothingburgers of storms, did nothing notable enough for an article. ~ Destroyeraa
9thx my edits 02:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Support If only it had made landfall, this merge discussion wouldn't be here. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 13:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Minor impacts and nothing significant about the storm Cyclonetracker (talk) 20:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a consensus for merging.
9thx my edits 02:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

I care a lot less about keeping this than most merge proposals just because of how generic the storm was and at least the season article isn't well developed. I'll merge this and delist if there's no discussion on this further by the end of the week.
Pacific ^Hurricane 05:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment See
WT:WPTC#Merge discussions getting out of hand: moratorium proposal. I think we should step away from merges for 3-5 months, and focus on creating. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 12:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Strong oppose it's a GA, but mostly it's cause of this. --
talk) 18:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Support - Linking to a discussion on merges has no merit here as you aren't being specific enough on how its relevant. You have to counter the arguments given by those in favor of merging here. The facts are this storm had no meaningful impact, broke no records, and the article relies too much on primary sourcing. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impacts can go in the article.ChessEric (talk · contribs) 01:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.