Talk:IAC Inc./Archives/2014

The result of the move request was Procedural close — the movereq procedure is not a substitute or shortcut around the deletion procedure.))
— V = I * R (talk) 23:16, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I think IAC/InterActiveCorp should be moved to User:Evosoho/IAC/old for edit history purposes. An article for IAC/InterActiveCorp would be devoloped at

That's entirely unnecessary. If you intend to improve the article, feel free to do so at it's current location. You have 7 days before the PROD will expire, and you can edit it during those days. Please review

WP:PROD. Feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any further questions. Killiondude (talk) 21:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

• PS.: when you request a move, the proper procedure is to use {{
  movereq}} template instead, which creates a mess. Thanks.
  — V = I * R (talk) 23:16, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus, not moved (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 03:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose – per
  WP:COMMONNAME. ENeville (talk) 17:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review

. No further edits should be made to this section.