Talk:Intelink

Networking task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

But is this the system that was compromised for the leaks to Wikileaks? Cable in question; http://213.251.145.96/cable/2008/08/08STATE90980.html If so, perhaps an expanded history is relevant to the article and a criticisms section since a few people have said it is distributed to too many people (exposing it to leaks).--Senor Freebie (talk) 04:09, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't compromised, entries were copied from classified sources, one of those sources was Intelink. As was released by the US Government in reports on Manning's trial.Wzrd1 (talk) 04:23, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Intelink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120524093812/http://www.dni.gov/reports/IC_Consumers_Guide_2009.pdf to http://www.dni.gov/reports/IC_Consumers_Guide_2009.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100410002010/http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress05/bald092105.htm to https://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress05/bald092105.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Intelink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150409003846/https://fas.org/irp/program/disseminate/osis.htm to https://fas.org/irp/program/disseminate/osis.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070422052142/http://iwar.org.uk/sigint/resources/csi/intel-in-the-internet-era.htm to http://www.iwar.org.uk/sigint/resources/csi/intel-in-the-internet-era.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061206094854/http://events.fcw.com/events/2006/KM/downloads/KM06_1-5_Andrus-CIA.pdf to http://events.fcw.com/events/2006/KM/downloads/KM06_1-5_Andrus-CIA.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]