Talk:Interstate 196/GA1
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 19:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- herefor what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (lists):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to ):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
- No issues
Lead
- No issues
Route description
- No issues
History
- No issues
Exit list
- No issues
References
- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to pass it at this time. Good work on this article and keep up the good work you are doing! Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)