Talk:Jerma

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

On 9 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Jerma (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Jerma (river) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Killarnee (talk) 07:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jerma people at 2536). LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 08:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 02:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment Previous discussion here. 162 etc. (talk) 10:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a fairly recent phenomenon, it looks like (all time monthly page views) traffic spikes started in May '17 and the interest has been consistently pronounced since November '18. WikiNav shows 848 identified clickstreams to the proposed primary topic over a total incoming traffic of 1159+15, so ~72% of the readers picked out that topic at #5 out of this list of 6 items, and a lot of the other traffic is identifiable (247, so ~21%). Despite this clearly large interest in this topic, it's not clear that the average English reader would strongly identify the term with this person esp. as it's such a novelty topic. Per
WP:DPT, we should have a discussion on long-term significance here before short-circuiting. --Joy (talk) 13:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Seems reasonable, I agree. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: discuss on long term significance here... – robertsky (talk) 02:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 02:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. No problem in need of fixing. Srnec (talk) 22:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to apparent
WP:RECENTISM. Google may be happy to serve up whatever is most popular this week. That's not what Wikipedia does. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Oppose. Clearly no primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, no PRIMARY.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.