Talk:Jesús Blancornelas/GA1
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer:
talk · contribs) 09:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
]
- herefor what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (lists):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):): c (OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- "In 1980, Blancornelas and co-founded the weekly magazine Zeta." - and who?
- "Their courageous example in the face of adversity – and the murder of 48 journalists – is said to be inspirational.[33]" - the underlined is Tomcat (7) 20:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)]
- I believe I've fixed these. In both instances, the sentences appeared to me simply extraneous: one an accidental redundancy, the second an expendable mention of Blancornelas's inspirational qualities. If ComputerJA disagrees, though, I'm fine with some form of them going back in. Khazar2 (talk) 22:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think your fixes are fine, Khazar2. Thanks! talk) 23:13, 18 October 2012 (UTC)]
- I think your fixes are fine, Khazar2. Thanks!
- I believe I've fixed these. In both instances, the sentences appeared to me simply extraneous: one an accidental redundancy, the second an expendable mention of Blancornelas's inspirational qualities. If ComputerJA disagrees, though, I'm fine with some form of them going back in. Khazar2 (talk) 22:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)