Talk:Jo Stafford/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bruce1ee (talk · contribs) 09:56, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this nomination. I should have it done towards the end of this week, so please bear with me. —Bruce1ee^talk 09:56, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   See Comments below Fixed

   B.

   lists

   :

   See Comments below Fixed

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an

   appropriate reference section

   :

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   See Comments below Fixed

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B.

   Focused

   :

4. Is it
   neutral
   ?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are

   copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

   :

   Nine free images used, all correctly tagged

   B. Images are provided if possible and are

   suitable captions

   :

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• 1A.
  • In the lead section, "She left the group in 1944. She recorded ..." could be changed to "She left the group in 1944 and recorded ...".
    • Done. Changed to "After leaving the group in 1944 she recorded..."
  • I think "syncopation" in the Early years section should be linked as it's not a common term.
    • Done.
  • I think the first occurrence of "The Pied Pipers" in the Pied Pipers section should be linked for clarity.
    • Done.
  • In the Pied Pipers section, the "cleaned out the refrigerator" statement is not explained here; the reference suggests that it was because the group was "very poor and very hungry", but is this statement necessary in the article?
    • Changed to "the group was invited along to give a performance"
  • In the Pied Pipers section, "By this time, it was successful enough in its own right" – is this statement necessary? It was a number one song.
    • Removed the that sentence.
  • In the Solo career section, I think "to Huddleston" should be added after "In 1944, after her divorce".
    • Done.
  • In the USO section, replace "
    USO" with "United Service Organizations
    (USO)".
    • Done.
  • In the USO section, link Pacific Theatre to Pacific War.
    • Done.
  • In the USO section, "at lights out" – should that not be "after lights out"?
    • Not sure. Wouldn't the hospital want the servicemen to sleep after lights out? Maybe they played the songs as the lights were being switched off. I'll have to look into it.
      • I'm sure it's ok as it is – don't worry.
        • I found a source somewhere that says before lights out, which kind of makes sense. I'll look for it again.
  • In the USO section, according to the reference, "Madame, I was there!" does not end with "!".
    • Done. I'll check though whether it was Madam, or Madame.
      • The reference says "Madame"
  • I think the first occurrence of "The Chesterfield Supper Club" in the Chesterfield Supper Club section should be linked for clarity.
    • Done.
  • I think that the Duets and VOA section needs to open with a statement that Stafford recorded several duets with Gordon MacRae, then discuss their songs.
    • Done.
  • In the Duets and VOA section, the 2nd paragraph is a little confusing: "In order to join Columbia, Stafford asked for an early release from her contract with Capitol.", but it says earlier that "Stafford had a clause inserted in her contract with the company [Capital] stating that if Weston left Capitol, she would automatically be released from her obligations to them."; why did she have to ask for an early release?
    • Done. Both are sourced, though I agree it is a little confusing. Since Nancy Franklin's article is based on an interview with Stafford I'm assuming that is the definitive version. It may be that they inserted another clause that required her to record so many songs for them, but that is unclear so I've just changed it to say that they wanted her to make eight more recordings for them before the end of the 1950.
  • In the 1960s section, I suggest changing "believed" to "felt" to avoid repetition in "She also said she did not believe she could perform in Broadway musicals, as she believed her voice".
    • Done.
  • In the Comedy performances section, can the 1st sentence be dated (when did this happen)?
    • Done,
  • In the Comedy performances section, "Columbia Records executive George Avakian named Weston's character Jonathan Edwards, for the 18th century Calvinist preacher. He asked Weston to record an album under this alias." – I'd suggest joining these two sentences: "... Calvinist preacher, and asked ...".
    • Done.
  • In the Comedy performances section, "As Weston thought, he worried that he might not be able to come up with enough material for an entire album alone." – is "As Weston thought" necessary; why not: "Weston worried ...".
    • Done.
  • In the Comedy performances section, "He asked his wife to join the project and Stafford then became Darlene Edwards, the off-key vocalist." – did this happen after the birth of Darlene Edwards described in the next paragraph?
    • Done. It seems the character came before the name, so I've reworded it slightly. Let me know if it's ok.
      • That seems fine.
  • In the Comedy performances section, link 1st occurrence of "Time magazine", delink the 2nd occurrence.
    • Done.
  • In the Comedy performances section, "The album was followed up with a "pop standards" album" – what was the "pop standards" album's title?
    • Done. It was Jonathan and Darlene Edwards in Paris, so I've changed things round slightly.
  • In the Comedy performances section, "In 1958, the Westons brought the pair to the television screen for a Jack Benny Shower of Stars and to The Garry Moore Show in 1960." – shouldn't that be "Jack Benny's Shower of Stars"?
    • Done.
  • copyright violations
    :

Article

"a mock hillbilly version of "Temptation", which she pronounced "Tim-tayshun""

Source

"a mock hillbilly version of " Temptation,," which she pronounced "Tim-tayshun,"

• Done.

• Should "hillbilly sent-up" not be "hillbilly send-up"?

• Yes, indeed. :)

Article

"triggered a national sensation as the public tried to identify the brazenly off-key singer and the piano player of dubious ability."

Source

"triggered a national sensation: trying to identify the artists behind the brazenly off-key singing and piano-playing of dubious ability"

• Done.

Article

"although they did record four sides for RCA Victor Records"

Source

"though they did record four sides for RCA Victor"

• Done.

• 1B.
  • There are inconsistencies in the abbreviation of United States, sometimes it's U.S., other times it's US; I see UK has no periods.
    • Done.
  • "She was admired by both critics and the listening public for the purity of her voice and was considered one of the most versatile vocalists of the era." appears in lead but is not covered in body of the article.
    • Done. Added to new section.
  • The Hollywood Walk of Fame statement at end of lead is not covered in the body of the article; how about adding an "Awards and recognition" section, there are several entries that could be added here: Grammy Award, Hollywood Walk of Fame, Best Dressed Women by the New York Fashion Academy, Big Band Academy of America's Golden Bandstand.
    • Done. Added to new section.
  • Some of the online references don't have "Retrieved" dates.
    • Could you highlight those concerned? I edit with a screen magnifier so it would help me find them more easily.

Ref 8 (Parabrisas.com)

Ref 17 (Lees, Gene, ed. (1989))

Ref 28 (Dunning, John, ed. (1998))

Ref 38 (Stafford, Jo (June 1953))

Ref 73 ("Singer Jo Stafford dies aged 90". BBC News)

Ref 74 (Find a Grave)

• Done.

• • Some of the Google Book references have no page numbers.
    • Could you highlight which ones?

Ref 26 (Music--As Written. Billboard. November 2, 1946)

Ref 50 (Talent Topics. Billboard. November 3, 1962)

Ref 51 (Jo Stafford's Dot LP Out in January. Billboard. October 23, 1965)

Ref 52 (First Annual Jockey Poll. Billboard. August 2, 1947)

Ref 53 (General Artists Corporation trade ad for Jo Stafford. Billboard. November 5, 2011)

Ref 54 (Nostalgia With Let-Down Trimming. Billboard. March 14, 1960)

Ref 67 (New LP, Tape Releases. Billboard. April 10, 1982)

Unfortunately I'm not able to enlarge these sufficiently enough to read them, and their file format means they won't run through text-to-speech either. Any thoughts?

I think it's ok to leave it as it is. I was only asking for page numbers for completeness, but the references are quite comprehensive as they are.

No worries, hopefully someone will stumble on the article and add them.

• • Ref 16 (Hall, Fred, ed. (1989)) cites page 52, but other pages appear to have been used, for example "the group was invited and speedily cleaned out the refrigerator." is on page 43.
    • Done.
  • Ref 24 (Full-page ad for the Chesterfield Supper Club) & Ref 27 (Ad for 'Chesterfield Supper Club) should be combined as they appear to point to the same Google Book page.
    • Done.
  • Ref 14 & Ref 37 (Weston, Paul; Stafford, Jo; Pawlak, Keith (2012)) can be combined.
    • Again, could you assist with this one.
      • The references have changed a bit, but now there are three that refer to this book: Refs 13, 36 & 71, and they can all be combined into one as you've done above. Just search for "Weston, Paul; Stafford, Jo; Pawlak, Keith (2012)"
        • There is a way of doing it so the book appears in the bibliography and refs can be linked to that, but I'm not sure how to do it. But I can arrange them so there is a bibliography with individual references in the main reflist, and hopefully someone who knows how to do it can actually link them together later.
          talk) 12:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
          ]
          • I've done what I think you wanted. There are several ways of doing it (see
            WP:CITESHORT
            ), but this is the way I do it.
            • Thanks, that was the one I was thinking of.

Please have a look at the above issues I've found. It's generally a well-written article with a good coverage of the subject. Some of the references are offline, but I've assumed good faith. Thanks. —Bruce1ee^talk 10:43, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Bruce1ee. I've addressed most of the points now, but there are one or two small things I'll need a bit of help with. Give me a shout if there's something I've missed. Cheers.

talk) 19:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for the updates. I've responded to the questions you raised above, and raised one of my own ("hillbilly sent-up"). —Bruce1ee^talk 08:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I think I've done everything I can with this now. Unfortunately there's a couple of things I'm not personally able to address due to software issues, but hopefully someone else can do that. Cheers again.

talk) 13:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Everything seems fine now; I've promoted the article to GA. Thanks for all your help and hard work. Regards. —Bruce1ee^talk 15:09, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fantastic, thanks.

talk) 15:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply

]