Talk:John Collins Covell/GA1
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 21:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 21:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is ", or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. lists:
WP:LEAD : |
---|
Check for
|
WP:LAYOUT : |
---|
Done
Check for
|
WP:WTW : |
---|
Done
Check for
Check for
|
WP:EMBED : |
---|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other GAs)
WP:RS : |
---|
Done
Check for Cross-checked with other GAs: Francis White (Virginia)
|
WP:MINREF : |
---|
Done
Check for inline citations
|
- c. No original research: Done
WP:NOR : |
---|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
Cross-checked with other GAs: Francis White (Virginia)
|
b.
Focused : |
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
WP:NPOV : |
---|
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content : Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are suitable captions : Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. The prose quality in particular is meticulous and engrossing. As per the above checklist, I do have some insights that I think will be useful in improving the article:
- I think the lead can be improved in order to provide an accessible overview and to give relative emphasis for the Early life and education.
- I think the layout needs to be fixed.
- I feel the table in the Personal life section is off-topic.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Caponer, please feel free to strike out any recommendation you think will not help in improving the article. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 20:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- talk) 02:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)]
The issues have been addressed, and I see no further concerns, so I'll pass this. Wizardman 03:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)