This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked
are unassessed
I will review this later today! --K. Peake 07:58, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Infobox and lead
Should Pye studios really be piped to when Pye Records in linked in the infobox anyway?
I think so since
Pye Studios may end up with its own article one day, rather than being a redirect to Pye Records
.
Move the inspiration sentence to being the one before the musical description
Done.
The term "simple" is not notable for the lead
Done.
"The song is one of" → ""Johnny Thunder" is one of"
Done. I also moved this sentence so it opened the paragraph, which seemed a bit more natural.
"Davies expressed desires publicly" → "Ray expressed desires publicly" per
MOS:SAMESURNAME
Done.
Should Anthony Gezale's stage name really be italicised?
I believe so by
MOS:WORDSASWORDS
.
Background and composition
Quote box and first para look good!
Should Johnny Thunder be surrounded by speech marks or is this about the name, not the song title?
I clarified it as The Johnny Thunder character...
Remove comma before "David Watts"
Done.
"lead character, Johnny, as" → "lead character Johnny, as"
Done.
Why is Johnny Thunder italicised?
MOS:WORDSASWORDS
Are you sure straightforward is an appropriate term, rather than something like traditional?
Andy Miller used the word "straightforward" to describe the song's simple production and Jon Savage describes it as one of the album's "great rock songs". I'm worried the way I had it written was a bit too close to
WP:SYNTH
, since the authors were saying different things, so I've rewritten it. I've left Savage to source it as being a rock song, while I've moved Miller's mention of it being a straightforward production to the recording section.
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; smooth article here! --K. Peake 20:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for another review Kyle Peake. I’m away for the weekend, so I’ll get to this one during the week. Tkbrett (✉) 12:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your patience Kyle Peake, responses are above. Tkbrett (✉) 15:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓Pass now, quality job and I understand your reasoning for not implementing certain changes! --K. Peake 07:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]