Talk:Kefka Palazzo/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 03:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I will be reviewing this article momentarily, so please bear with me, guys. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the long wait, lads. Now then, let the GA review begin!

here
for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (
    lists
    )
    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
    There are inconsistent date formats and author name formats.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (
    focused
    )
    :
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
    All of the images have excellent fair use rationales and the captions presented here are suitable enough.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I will see if this article passes or fails the GA criteria.All right, I am going to pass this as a GA! Good work to everyone here!

Hope these help! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I updated the referencing, let me know if I did what was asked. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]