Talk:Kefka Palazzo/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 03:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello again! I will be reviewing this article momentarily, so please bear with me, guys. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the long wait, lads. Now then, let the GA review begin!
- herefor what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (
lists):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reliable sources):):
c (OR
- There are inconsistent date formats and author name formats.
- a (
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (focused):
- a (
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have suitable captions):
- All of the images have excellent fair use rationales and the captions presented here are suitable enough.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I will see if this article passes or fails the GA criteria.All right, I am going to pass this as a GA! Good work to everyone here!
- Pass/Fail:
Hope these help! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! I updated the referencing, let me know if I did what was asked. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)