This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
A fact from Kukulkan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 March 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Why do you guys always call them "cults"?
Isn't that a little disrespectful to their religious beliefs?
Ed Reynolds — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.45.120 (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Watkins and Wilson are not reliable sources
fringe work and should not be used to reference this article. Watkins' work, a travelogue about hiking thru Norway, is similarly unsuitable to reference a work on a Mayan deity. Rather we should be using works by academics who have studied Mayan deities. Sorry, and thanks, Madman (talk) 12:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Reverting the entire page because you disagree with a reference is not an improvement. I'll do your job for you and revert to my previous edits minus the content you find objectionable. Ryan (talk) 13:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Most of those earlier additions that were reverted were inaccurate in any event. Such as, confusing the Maya for the Aztec in the apocryphal myth of Cortes-as-returned-kukulkan/quetzalcoatl. The pop-culture ref could be lost without any detriment to the article, tho I realise it's a losing battle at times keeping too-trivial mentions out of articles like these.
As it stands this article mostly repeats modern generic (mis)conceptions, & is in need of an overhaul. Will look to at least add in some reliable refs, maybe also change the focus of the article to concentrate on postclassic/colonial-era Yucatec uses & mentions, since as a pan-Maya concept it would be largely redundant with other articles. --cjllwʘTALK 01:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Illustrations: Serpents or Feathered Serpents?
Most of the pictures do not depict feathered serpents!77.162.130.139 (talk) 19:25, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there is a separate
Feathered Serpent (deity) article; this is an article about Kukulkan, however he/it may have been represented. All the images are relevant to the deity, even the Vision Serpent, from which it is argued that Kukulkan developed. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Quetzalcoatl/kukulkan
There is too much disscusion over Kukulkan being of white decent not to include it in the artice —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yargotune (talk • contribs) 20:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kukulcan spelling
I think the article should be named "Kukulcan" instead of "Kukulkan", since this is the spelling used in most sources (see [1][2][3]). 26agcp (talk) 03:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
