Talk:Left anterior descending artery
project's importance scale. | ||
This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy. |
This
This should be merged into the section of
or, it at least should have its title changed to "left anterior descending artery". Sfahey 15:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Should be merged into
The Widowmaker
Belongs here. Google it if you need additional reading. AStudent (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Clarification on the animated picture
Its not entirely obvious what this picture is supposed to be showing. I think it should be pointed out. I can't do it myself though, cause I'm not sure what its depicting. Clearly one half of it references the article, but the other half is confusing. Is it a comparison picture? The same heart at a different time? 74.134.243.62 (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Merger proposal
Propose to merge the
- Yes good idea. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree! Maestroso simplo (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, the articles overlap widely. --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- It looks like there's some good agreement on this merger so far. I was thinking we could merge now but WP:MERGETEXT and understand it but that doesn't necessarily mean I'll be able to do it. Maestroso simplo (talk) 01:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)]
- It looks like there's some good agreement on this merger so far. I was thinking we could merge now but
- I agree, the articles overlap widely. --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree! Maestroso simplo (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes good idea. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Support. No need for a hurry, I suggest perform in a couple of days if no problem. --
- Merged now, after recommended one week. Brandmeistertalk 12:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
The merge was a good thing IMO, but it now means that almost 60% of this article, and the largest single section, is not about the subject of the article, but rather about how the LAD is sometimes referred to as the "widow-maker". That seems disproportionate, and is verging on sensationalism. Suggest pulling that down to a single statement in the main content (and removal of the reference to "widow-maker" in the lede) Thomask0 (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Variant
Would love to see variant of LAD such as type I,II, III R.Radzi (talk) 02:38, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- So it is up to you to make the change.
Title
I've moved this page to its much more commonly used variant, LAD. N-gram: [1] --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Tom. I will help Wiki whenever I can. R.Radzi (talk) 08:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)