Talk:Louder Now/GA1
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 23:55, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute
|
Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the list incorporation .
|
||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline .
|
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as audio :
| ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions .
|
||
7. Overall assessment. |
- User:Secondadam, the person that uploaded File:Eric_Valentine.png, was asked on talk) 21:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)]
- Based on what went down in the talk page, I am going to guess that it is not copyrighted correctly. I would like it if you removed it from the article. The Tbsatmarysville photo should be fine. Kees08 (talk) 03:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Per talk) 23:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)]
- Changed the DVD track listing. talk) 23:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)]
- Changed the DVD track listing.
- Per
Drive-by comments
The IGN review should be even closer paraphrased, comes up with a 40%+ copyvio rating. I was told with
- Thanks for checking in on this and the input. I do disagree with whomever wrote your review. There is no hard and fast rule for copyvio %'s, its just a tool. Using it as a tool, everything that is being noted as copyright is in quotations or the name of song titles, like you pointed out. So I am fine with it the way it is, and I encourage the article to not change to make the tool say what we want it to say. Thanks again for stopping by though! Kees08 (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)