Talk:Lyon-class battleship/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 23:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Will review! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I've made a few minor edits:[1]
Short but sweet article. Very good!
here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- a. prose: copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- b. complies with list incorporation:
- a. prose:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- b. provides reliable sourceswhere necessary:
- c. no original research:
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Does it follow the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- fair representation without bias:
- fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- no edit wars, etc:
- no edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass!
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)