Talk:MJAFT!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Sources

I understand that sources being cited is important, but this is getting out of hand. Since when do we need third-party sources to back up what an organisation's agenda is? What next? An external source that confirms what the UN's goal as stated in its charter are? This article barely states anything at all, if it needs work it needs updating and expanding, not citing. --

Chlämens 02:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

If there are no 3rd party sources reporting about the organization then it lacks notability and the article should be deleted. Please notice that reliable sources in Albanian or other languages are acceptable if no English equivalent is available. JRSP 12:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MJAFT is mentioned in the Albanian and the foreign media all the time, they are even funded by various foreign embassies and through the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe,([1]). Rather than adding such tags everywhere, it might not be such a bad idea to evaluate case by case. --
Chlämens 14:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Could you get some reference to the organization from a reputable news agency like BBC, AP, Reuters, etc? This would be a proof of [[WP:|notability]]. As the article stands now, MJAFT page can be used to source most statements but if you are planning to expand it the article will surely need neutral reliable sources. We also need some balance: what do other Albanian organizations think about MJAFT? JRSP 12:23, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]