Talk:Mayanist

Archaeology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Strong oppose of proposed merge; completely different subjects with similar sounding names. -- Infrogmation 19:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong oppose ditto. The concept of modern-day "Mayanism" is almost in direct opposition to what Mayanist scholarship entails- they should be separated with a ten-foot bargepole.--cjllw ʘ TALK 02:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have now removed the merge tag, it's been a week or so and no comments in favour. --cjllw ʘ TALK 00:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Stephen Houston [born 1958] Holding a Phd. from Yale, Dr. Houston is an Epigrapher extraordinaire!"
The exclamation point is intended to express an opinion, which is inappropriate (with regard to value judgment) and silly.
ExistentialAmbigram (talk) 01:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this to attention. That was part of a series of sometimes idiosyncratic and verbose descriptions added by an anon editor that IMO remained in the article too long. I have edited the descriptions. Infrogmation (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three out of four paragraphs were about the word 'Mayanist'! I combined them. —Tamfang (talk) 20:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]