Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich DIS/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Bushranger (talk · contribs) 01:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

here
for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (
lists
):
A few grammar smoothings are required - for instance, "with service designation MiG-5 was reserved" is rather awkward. The Russian words defining OKO should be italicised, for two examples. Also, the "design and development" section should be subdivided, I believe - the flight testing should be in a seperate section/subsection.
All done, I believe.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (OR
):
References are accurate and reliable, without OR. While technically meeting the requirement I think the long paragraphs shouldn't be cited just at the end - it's an invitation for later additions to
"pretend"
to be referenced.
My articles may be hijacked later on, but I'll take that risk.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough.

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):

It follows the neutral point of view
policy.
Fair representation without bias:

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have
suitable captions
):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Placing this on hold while the above comments are addressed. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go. Nice work. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich_DIS/GA1&oldid=1027998753"