Search results
There is a page named "Talk:MoS:BIO" on Wikipedia
- 71 bytes (0 words) - 11:38, 11 June 2018
- 71 bytes (0 words) - 15:44, 12 June 2018
- (prose): b (MoS): Reasonably well written and generally complies sufficiently with the MoS, but there are couple of issues with MOS:BIO It is factually...4 KB (394 words) - 14:52, 16 October 2023
- article refers to the subject by his full name throughout the articles (MOS:BIO requires that we identify subjects by surname only after the first mention)...2 KB (224 words) - 13:48, 7 March 2022
- etc) (added ---J.S (t|c)) ---J.S (t|c) 18:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC) I reverted recent edits by Arvin singh as per MoS:HEAD, MoS:BIO, and WP:EL. Any disagreement...5 KB (720 words) - 03:53, 17 February 2024
- criteria) It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS): Please see comments below, under 'MOS issues' and 'Prose' issues. It is factually accurate...7 KB (768 words) - 02:38, 23 April 2012
- This article should be cleaned up per WP:BIO and WP:MoS. I will do some but I am not good at WP:BIO. Sumsum2010 · Talk · Contributions 23:50, 27 August...698 bytes (41 words) - 06:23, 1 February 2024
- Talk:John Hathorn (category Start-Class U.S. Congress articles)read the guidelines, at WP:MoS. Kraxler (talk) 00:44, 28 September 2012 (UTC) Hello - I checked the Manuel of Style WP:MoS page you referenced and searched...1 KB (178 words) - 05:35, 15 February 2024
- there's a typo. Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:56, 27 December 2011 (UTC) Is there a MoS convention that says third should be used...5 KB (495 words) - 06:20, 27 December 2011
- abbreviations, but I don't think it contravenes the MoS either way. Spelled out.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)...4 KB (403 words) - 21:25, 7 February 2012
- For WP:BIO - failed due to insufficient inline citations (many unreferenced sentences). I'd also suggest splitting biography from work, see for example...1 KB (91 words) - 21:43, 13 February 2024
- WP:WIAGA for criteria Is it reasonably well written? A. Prose quality: B. MoS compliance: Is it factually accurate and verifiable? A. References to sources:...3 KB (166 words) - 01:40, 30 August 2010
- conciseness, clarity and grammatical correctness. I also believe it has some MoS issues that should be addressed. I'll be back after a more thorough reading...19 KB (2,666 words) - 13:56, 13 July 2012
- wrestling bio review, so apologies if I miss something that is a common style point in them. It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS): "Eve won...4 KB (334 words) - 19:24, 7 June 2022
- played as a defensive back at Venice High School.? done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC) What verifies The major...5 KB (353 words) - 14:01, 1 February 2023
- played as a defensive back at Venice High School.? done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC) What verifies The major...853 bytes (367 words) - 22:02, 20 February 2024
- article refers to the subject by his full name throughout the articles (MOS:BIO requires that we identify subjects by surname only after the first mention)...2 KB (512 words) - 21:02, 13 February 2024
- January 2011 (UTC) School team bios would include them and he is not listed at Scout.com or Rivals.com.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:33,...5 KB (493 words) - 12:48, 19 January 2011
- written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): I am not sure if his DOB doesn't follow MOS:BIO but wouldn't it be better...4 KB (529 words) - 07:18, 18 June 2011
- to the Puigdemont article; for all others, MOS:BIO still applies. If you wish to contest the way MOS:BIO is applied, then I suggest you to seek consensus...47 KB (6,714 words) - 05:13, 12 October 2018