Talk:Moves like Jagger/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Archive 1

Platinum

Platinum in New Zealand is reached with 10.000 not 15.000 http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/international-award-levels.pdf --2811Butterfly (talk) 13:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

No Platinum in NZ is reached with 15,000 and Gold is 7,500.219.89.131.201 (talk) 02:53, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

I've fixed some of the hideous advertising...

...but you may wish to keep the notice for the time being.

I altered the end of the very first paragraph, which was horrible, poorly-written puff (don't PRs go to school any more?) and further on I killed some peacock words such as "irresistible whistle" and "trademark vocals". If this is reverted, it's someone else's problem - I never get involved in edit wars against people with vested interests in any topic I may try to fix. Blitterbug 22:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blitterbug (talk • contribs)

Are ratings from about.com even relevant these days? I'd remove that as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.19.180.179 (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Moves Like Jagger

Moves Like Jagger is 2x Platinum in the USA... Source=RIAA Please change that ;) ! --79.199.19.208 (talk) 20:59, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Was changed by Chronisgr --Jnorton7558 (talk) 13:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Moveslikejagger-single.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Moveslikejagger-single.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is
    non-free
    then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
    fair use rationale
    then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --

talk
) 12:35, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Reception

So there were NO negative reviews of this bland, auto-tuned crap? I find that very difficult to believe. There need to be some negative reviews included to balance out this entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.160.210 (talk) 17:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Introductory Paragraph

"Moves Like Jagger" didn't have 26 weeks in the Top Ten (Hot 100), though it came close. There was a jump into the Top Ten initially, then a week or two out of the Top Ten, followed by a performance of the hit on "The Voice"...causing a huge jump back into the top tier, soon followed by the No. 1 reign. "Moves..." is currently at No. 12, but might move back up to truly have 25 or whatever non-consecutive weeks in the Top Ten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.146.149 (talk) 20:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Chart achievement

I corrected the claimed chart achievement for Adam Levine because it didn't match what the source said. Levine is not the first person to be in the top 10 of the Hot 100 both solo and as a member of a group at the same time. For example, John Lennon was in the top 10 simultaneously in 1970 with "Instant Karma!" solo and "Let It Be" with the Beatles. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

File:AMA2011XTINA.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:AMA2011XTINA.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is
    non-free
    then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
    fair use rationale
    then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:AMA2011XTINA.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --

talk
) 18:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Lack of Originality

So no mention that this song heavily samples Modjo's "Lady (Hear Me Tonight)" which samples Chic's "Soup for One"? 24.22.157.228 (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


Moves Like Jagger → Moves like Jagger – Unreal7 (talk
) 12:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

"Like" is a preposition and therefore shouldn't be capitalised. See Someone like You (Adele song). Unreal7 (talk) 12:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

SOUTH KOREA SALES

--189.172.88.68 (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

All Time Chart

Include chats of all time: http://www.officialcharts.com/chart-news/lady-gaga-scores-another-million-selling-single-2425/ and http://norwegiancharts.com/bestall.asp

talk
) 02:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Title capitalization

Page name is "Moves like Jagger" while the intro to the article uses "Moves Like Jagger". The latter appears correct unless I don't know something about this song having weird capitalization. The article should probably moved to

Moves Like Jagger ? 99.238.174.96 (talk
) 08:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Please see the record of the "Requested move" discussion above. In the absence of another formal discussion indicating otherwise, the article should have stayed at "Moves like Jagger" and the capitalization within the article should have been changed as necessary to correspond with that. Please see
WP:NCM for a description of the Wikipedia stylization for composition titles. —BarrelProof (talk
) 05:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
'Like' is not capitalised when it is a preposition, only when it is a verb; "Moves Like Jagger" reads as 'people called Move have a liking for Jagger'. See also "Someone like You" as opposed to "I Really Like You". Btljs (talk) 09:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Is this a number one for Christina Aguilera?

The song is credit to Maroon 5 featuring Christina Aguilera which I have heard means that also she is on teh record, it does not actually count as one of her songs. The article currently states that this song made her the second female artist to make her have a number one hit in three consecutive decades, after Britney Spears. If what I said is true then surely Christina Aguilera has NOT had a number one in three consecutive decades, or if she did it would NOT be due to this song. I though I'd better mention it here before doing any major edits to the article and having them reversed or causing some upset. Can anyone advise here please? 22:28, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress

There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects this page, suggesting that the capitalization of "like" should be removed. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 16:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner
:Online 19:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on Moves like Jagger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Moves like Jagger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

"Cover versions and in other media"

This section is a mess and loaded with trivia.

Whoever wrote this section does not seem to understand what a paragraph is, so the whole thing is a mass of unrelated sentences. In truth, it is a list of random factoids formatted as if it is a paragraph.

Most to the point, it is comprised of two types of rejected content:

WP:IPC
.

For

WP:NSONG
on their own without the original version. In most cases that would be versions that were recorded, released and charted. That lets in none of the performances listed. The second possibility would be versions discussed in independent reliable sources discussing the song. Sure Jane Smith sang the song in concert a couple of times and articles on Smith and her concert mention it, but the guideline is looking for sources about the song that show Smith's performances are a meaningful part of the song's history. Again, none of those listed meet this.

WP:IPC
(and the banner I've added) say such sections -- if included at all -- should discuss the subject's impact on popular culture, not merely be an indiscriminate list of appearances in pop culture (like this one). So the movie Rocky, for example, rather than listing random SNL skits, a joke montage on Seinfeld and a scene in another movie where a character compares himself to Rocky would instead cite reliable sources discussing the film's impact on tourism in Philadelphia and the Philadelphia Art Museum, spread of the Philadelphia dialect and slang, etc. The current section is essentially an indiscriminate list (though formatted as a paragraph) of uses in popular culture, rather than a sourced discussion of the song's impact on popular culture. It is entirely likely that this song has not really impacted popular culture: it did not pull Mick Jagger out of some imagined obscurity, his dancing was not suddenly of renewed interest as a result of the song and biographies on Jagger and/or the Stones written in 5 years will not have chapters dedicated to the impact of this song.

As my explained removal of the section was reverted without explanation of any kind, I will let this sit for a few days, hoping for discussion or explanation as to how the material meets the guidelines presented. Failing that, I will remove the material again. - SummerPhDv2.0 13:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Covers

@

WP:COVERSONG sufficiently yet. I have all those song on my watchlist, so I will keep an eye and see if those IPs try to revert you. --David Tornheim (talk
) 00:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC) VSC - WATERFLAME STALKER X MOVES LIKE JAGGER MASHUP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1370:8129:B27D:1D86:741A:6467:4EC (talk) 22:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Moves_like_Jagger/Archive_1&oldid=1098788210"