Talk:Nasal bridge

Figure and description not helpful

As a layman who wanted to find out what a nose bridge is, both the description and figure are extremely disappointing, especially the figure. The description is incomplete and I can't figure out where or what the nasal bridge is. Eg, what are the nasal bones? and where is the bony part overlying them? The figure should have clearly marked the 'nasal brdige,' but there are just various odd labels on the image, that can only be discernible to someone who is already an expert, not to a layman.(182.64.31.52 (talk) 08:33, 29 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

At the left there are no arrows on the picture of the woman. On the right a quick glance makes the reader think the blue stuff must be what the article is about. Disaster. Jidanni (talk) 00:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Low causes high ambiguity

The meaning of "low" is ambiguous. It might mean that some part of the nose is lower on the face, or it might mean that some part of the nose extends to a lower height above the face. -- SEWilco (talk) 18:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nasal bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130217173715/http://www.utmb.edu/otoref/grnds/Genetic-HL-2004-0317/Genetic-HL-2004-0317.doc to http://www.utmb.edu/otoref/grnds/genetic-hl-2004-0317/genetic-hl-2004-0317.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]