Talk:Persona 2: Eternal Punishment/GA1

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (

   lists

   ):

   "In response to this, the original version was released on PlayStation Network in 2013" - which version? The PS1 or PSP?

   " Reception of the game in Japan and the west has generally been positive" - I feel that critical reception could be fleshed out a bit in the lead

   The reception box should include (PS1) in brackets instead of (PS)

   "For Kitajoh, one of the most notable arrangements he did was for "Maya's Theme"" - composed?

   a (references): b (citations to

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

   References check out OK, reliable sources, no evidence of OR

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable, no edit warring

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have

   suitable captions

   ):

   No images used

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Once again, I couldn't find anything at all to put this on hold, hence the unusually speedy review. Good work on building another article to GA! JAGUAR  20:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--

talk 21:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@

talk 21:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for tending to them! I think leaving out "composed" should be fine as it sounds good the way it is. JAGUAR  13:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: Not to be a party pooper, but did you see my earlier comments on the talk page? I was looking at potentially reviewing the article for GA but figured I'd rather maybe help rewrite parts of the article instead (which would mean not reviewing it). Do you just not agree with them, or did you not see them? (I'd personally think that the Gameplay section needs a major overhaul, and the Setting / Plot section needs some rearrangement & refocusing, as the most notable issues... but maybe this is too high a level of nitpicking for GA.) SnowFire (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]