Talk:Phantasmagoria (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Untitled

I guess all other uses are derived from the old poem, maybe this should be investigated...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.211.132.72 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 October 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. (

talk) 02:28, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

– No primarytopic –

WP:NOTDICT. Dicklyon (talk) 03:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. JHunterJ (talk) 17:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Pageviews. The August 2018 spike for
WP:NOTDICT is relevant to this case. Phantasmagoria seems to me like a legitimate encyclopedic topic, not just a word. Colin M (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Yes, it's a legit topic. I just meant that being the definition of the word doesn't make it primarytopic. Dicklyon (talk) 21:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Every later use of the word "Phantasmagoria", mainly as a title, seems to have been inspired by the original horror theatre shows. Usually such a title seems to be chosen as an obvious reference to that type of show. Therefore I think it makes more sense to keep it as it is. Joortje1 (talk) 11:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's not among the criteria at
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. It's clearly not even close to half the page views, so disambiguation seems a better choice. Dicklyon (talk) 21:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Strong oppose Primary topic by longterm significance.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. All others seem derivative. Disambiguation pages should be suffixed with "(disambiguation)" to indicate what they are. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.