Talk:Picture to Burn/GA1
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- herefor what they are not)
My first impression of this article is that it is of good size, and of reasonable quality.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (lists):
- The lede is excellent. I think country music should be changed to country in the 'Composition' section. I really don't understand the sentence 'Swift's boasts with big vocals that span two octaves, from G3 to C5'.
- a (prose): b (
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The GAC link does not link to the blog post that is being referenced.
- a (references): b (citations to
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Thanks for the review. I have made a few changes and since Ipodnano's busy in real life, I'd be happy to address the remaining issues, if there are any. talk) 11:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)]
- Thanks for the review. I have made a few changes and since Ipodnano's busy in real life, I'd be happy to address the remaining issues, if there are any.