Talk:Radio Songs (chart)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Comments

Why would you propose to merge the chart articles together? Removed the template until a viable reason is given. The Man Who Needs No Introduction! (talk) 00:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

where?

where did the sentence "988 stations, comprised of top 40, adult contemporary, R&B/hip-hop, country, rock, gospel, Latin and Christian formats, are electronically monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. This data is used to compile The Billboard Hot 100." came from? can you give me a link? thanks Ofekalef (talk) 12:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most consecutive #1's

Why is Rihanna listed as holding the record? Did Rockstar 101 not count as a single on that chart?

Ketchup12345 (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Ketchup12345
Rockstar 101 never charted on radio songs. 99.6.253.145 (talk) 00:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved.

Nathan Johnson (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]



Hot 100 Airplay (Radio Songs)Radio Songs – The most commonly known name for this chart is now Radio Songs. Its never been known as Hot 100 Airplay (Radio Songs) though separately it was known as those two names. The album article currently located at Radio Songs should move to Radio Songs (album) as it definitely is NOT the most common subject under that title — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 20:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Oppose as ambiguous term in need of a disambiguator. Simply relying on capital letters and plural is hardly sufficient, and is unhelpful to readers looking for, for example, the song namesake. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 23:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  • Comment should really support this I suppose as per the Red meat Red Meat guideline (wherever that is), but little voice says current title or Radio Songs (Billboard) or Radio Songs (chart) would be more helpful. Especially in an area where overcapitalization is endemic. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Hot 100 Airplay is used in both the print edition and online at BillboardBiz to this day (as seen here in this week's current tally). If the name had been replaced or changed, I might agree, but both still apply and are equally valid. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:38, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. No prejudice against a future request, especially if further sources after the name change can illuminate the issue. --BDD (talk) 20:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hot 100 Airplay (Radio Songs) → Radio Songs (chart) – the name of the chart has been officially changed to Radio Songs per this announcement on Billboard.com. Not sure if this should be move to Radio Songs, currently an article for an album which can be moved to Radio Songs (album), or if Radio Songs should be repurposed as a disambiguation page, or just continue with the use of hatnotes. Relisted. BDD (talk) 22:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC) StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Discussion

Although I oppose this move as proposed, I don't think the current title Hot 100 Airplay (Radio Songs) is a good one either. It looks like a Wikipedia disambiguation, but it's not really, instead it's two possible titles rolled into one.

Radio Songs (undisambiguated) was rejected above, just a few months ago, and there's no evidence of change since then. Radio Songs (chart) doesn't have a lot of support either. What about disambiguating Hot 100 Airplay in some standard way instead?

Or just dropping the disambiguator to

Hot 100 Airplay
? It was at that title for some years, until it was moved in an apparently undiscussed move to Billboard Hot 100 Airplay with the not too helpful edit summary Real name. It was then moved to its current name, apparently also undiscussed, with the edit summary Simplifying billboard chart names.

So it's already been a long saga, with little discussion and no obvious reference to the article name policy. At least we are now correcting those two problems! Andrewa (talk) 05:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many song article source Billboard to discuss the song's chart performance in the United States. If Billboard is used as the source regarding songs that reach this chart from this point going forward, the only thing it can be referred to as is Radio Songs because that what the source will say (whether someone looks it up online or in an archived print edition). I've found a couple of non-Billboard sources that refer to the chart as "Radio Songs" prior to the uniform change across all Billboard platforms, one from NPR, one at Pitchfork, another at Audio Ink Radio, as well as a couple of books [1][2]. But I do find sources which refer to the chart as Hot 100 Airplay in this timeframe, such as this one from VOAnews.com. It seems a bit early to find sources that might still refer to it as Hot 100 Airplay since Billboard's across-the-board name change. Sorry if this doesn't help matters any. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 09:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

New tracking week adjustments occuring in July

Link to the story so that this info can be inserted into the article when it occurs: [3]
Please add this message to other talk pages of Billboard-related articles (so that I don't hve to do ALL of them!) Thank you! - eo (talk) 19:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

WP:COMMONNAME. (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:COMMONNAME takes into account what other sources call it, not what Billboard calls it. Both names were used for a number of years simultaneously, as many of the chart names were changed only for the public while industry continued to use the more traditional names. That's been pretty much consolidated though, and I agree the title of the article should be changed but to Radio Songs (chart) (there's an album with the title, so disambiguation may be necessary) or just simply Radio Songs as primary topic. "Billboard" is not part of the name of the chart. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
I think Radio Songs can reasonably qualify as primary topic. Rename to Radio Songs (chart) is also a good alternative. (talk) 03:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.