Talk:Recorder (musical instrument)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

WP:GAR

.

Major contributors and projects notified.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
Large sections are unreferenced which is grounds to de-list immediately. References that are there are often unverifiable, for books list author/editor, pages numbers, etc. use cite books template. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
b (citations to
reliable sources
):
Quiet a few personal website in there, please read
WP:RS. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
c (OR):
???? I don't know until references are found. Jezhotwells (talk)
It is broad in its scope.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view
policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales
):
File:Altorecorder.jpg ⋅can't be pd-old as it it is a modern photograph. Likewise File:Tenorrecorder.jpg; File:Numbered finger holes.jpg# is downloaded form where?;
b (appropriate use with
suitable captions
):
Some images are uncaptioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Delist. A loty of issues to be fixed. please bring to
WP:GAN when fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Hey - this discussion is of an appallingly low standard itself! Claim that long sections are unreferenced - whichsections? You don't tell us. "Quite a few personal websites"? List them, please, because i can't see ANY! Downgrading for good reason is fine, but this is just ridiculous.

OldTownAdge (talk) 12:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]