Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Nueva Segovia

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Nueva Segovia is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Speedy criteria '3 No content whatsoever. Any article consisting only of links elsewhere (including hyperlinks, category tags and "see also" sections), a rephrasing of the title, and/or attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title. This does not include disambiguation pages.'

is not met.

The version that was tagged for speedy deletion was [1]. The only thing that couldn't be made up from the title alone is "in the Philippines". As such, this is

no content. SalaSkan 15:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

You should indeed improve your logical thinking, before anymore such taggings that disturb Wikipedia content creation.

(Talk) 17:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Article definitely lacks context? What is Archdiocese? Where (or what) is Nueva Segovia? Cant I even read the first line without drifting off to a hunting mission? --soum ^talk 17:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a clear A1 speedy delete candidate. I will leave this talk page, but I will delete the article. A predicate nominative is a fact and not an article. An article contains discussion, context, history, and not a mere statement of a single fact. "Moby Dick is a novel" is not an article. Geogre 18:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene, this is still on the edge. We all feel in our hearts that it's a significant place/organizational center, but that feeling has to be borne out in our page. I do not know anything about Eugene Onegin, but I feel sure that there is a lot to say. Having an article that says, "This is a major work of literature" really wouldn't be acceptable to retain, nor would it represent work that would need to be preserved under GFDL. It would be, instead, a placeholder -- reserving a spot and marking it without the benefit of any real writing. It is in fact because we should honor our authors that we shouldn't preserve predicate nominatives as if they were writing. They're not. Geogre 16:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]