Talk:Ryuji Sasai/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lazman321 (talk · contribs) 15:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this article on this composer for you. Lazman321 (talk) 15:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1 - Well written

1a - Clear and concise

I only found one prose problem. Everything else is well written.

• "the band were active for a decade." to "the band was active for a decade.

Lazman321 (talk) 15:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1b - Adherence to the Manual of Style

I am a little bit doubtful about the usage of "famous for his rock style" in this article. The source cited does not say that Ryuji Sasai is "famous for his rock style", rather it says that he "has struck gold once again with Bushido Blade 2." I recommend removing any statement that he is "famous for his rock style" unless you can find a better source for this. Other than that, all the other criterion of the Manual of Style required for Good Articles is met on this article. Lazman321 (talk) 15:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2 - Verifiable with no original research

2a - List of references

There is indeed a list of references and every source is identifiable. This criterion does ✓ Pass. Lazman321 (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2b - Reliable sources

Virtually all the sources used are reliable. I say "virtually all" because I am concerned about the usage of Ryuji Sasai's profile page on Video Game Music Online. The

Based on the sources provided, there is no original research (not counting the GameSpot sources that don't mention composers at all). At the present moment, this article does ✓ Pass this criterion. Lazman321 (talk) 16:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2d - No copyright violations

With a copyvio score of 20.6 %, this articles does ✓ Pass this criterion. Lazman321 (talk) 16:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3 - Broad in its coverage

3a - Main aspects

Based on the sources provided, the interview conducted by Original Sound Version seems to have some pretty good information that could be added. The most noteworthy of these is that after leaving Square, he "composed and arranged music for bishoujo games, pachinko machines, and bands." Other than that, there is a chance that many details and information will be found during your source search which could be added. You don't have to feel pressured to find and add too much information, however, as the criteria only require the main aspects to be addressed. Lazman321 (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3b - Focused

All the information in this article is related to Ryuji Sasai. As such, this article does ✓ Pass this criterion. Lazman321 (talk) 16:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

4 - Neutral

This article is neutral in its information about Ryuji Sasai. This article does ✓ Pass this criterion. Lazman321 (talk) 16:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5 - Stable

This article has not been edited since June 15, 2021. There is no editing dispute nor is there an edit war. As such, this article does ✓ Pass this criterion. Lazman321 (talk) 16:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

6 - Illustrated

6a - Copyright tags

There are no images. This article does ✓ Pass this criterion by default. Lazman321 (talk) 16:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

6b - Relevant media

I would like to see an image of Ryuji Sasai. However, I don't think this is possible as Ryuji Sasai is still alive, meaning any images of him would not be able to use fair use. Unless you can find a free image of Ryuji Sasai, this article does ✓ Pass this criterion. Lazman321 (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

7 - Verdict

Considering the source search you will have to do in order to make this article pass, I will put this one  On hold for 14 days. If needed, I can be flexible with this time so you have more time to find sources for this article. Lazman321 (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Status::

Thank you for the review! I see now that the fixes needed are a bit more extensive than I currently have time for, but I or someone will have the exact starting place to get this further along toward Good Article Status. I would close this for now and perhaps it can be resumed another time. Again, thank you for your review! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC) @Lazman321:[reply]

You're welcome. I will close this review as ✗ Fail and we can resume another time. Lazman321 (talk) 14:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]