Talk:Sam Quek/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bait30 (talk · contribs) 20:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this within the next week. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 20:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Lead looks good to me.

Early life

"(then) independent": should probably just be removed. I'm not sure this extra info about the school is useful in an article about Quek. Removing it would also fix a
MOS:SEAOFBLUE
issue. (3b)

Amended. I also removed "in Birkenhead" after "
Birkenhead High School". BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Career

"and a few months later": I'm not sure what happened here because this is a new sentence, but it starts lowercase and with a coordinating conjunction. (1a)
"In 2020, she was announced...": saying that she was announced makes it seem like it hasn't happened yet, but later on it says she finished as a runner up. Should be reworded to be less confusing. (1a)

I've made those amendments. and some other small copyedits to the section. I've also changed the Celebrity Masterchef reference to one that shows she reached the final. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

seems good to me.

Images

Images are relevant and appropriately tagged.
For the Quek vs Argentina photo, I would recommend mentioning that Quek is the one on the right. (6b)

Amended the caption. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done with the prose. I will review the references very soon. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 01:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

All good.

Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 02:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking on the review and for your constructive comments, Bait30. Hopefully I've addressed your points; let me know if there is anything else to be done. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist so far

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (
lists
):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (
reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism
):

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: