Talk:Shakti pitha

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hinduism: Shaktism High‑importance High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Shaktism task force (assessed as High-importance). Nepal Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The merger is a must and this should be done at the earliest. --Bhadani 17:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC) Jay Hind — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:6800:B0E7:FDCE:529C:B715:1F5F (talk) 19:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been merged with

Today I have tried to provide the exact geo-locations with intra-wiki links as far as possible for the first 10 items. I propose to do the rest in phases. VMO 09:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Items 11 to 30 updated. I am working on the rest 11 items. VMO 03:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Items 31 to 51 updated. VMO 14:36, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No where Tulja Bhavani (From Tuljapur of Maharashtra)is mentioned, As I read through a old book of shaktipitha wel published from haridwar in 1970s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.80.57.2 (talk) 10:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The list of shaktipeeths is completely wrong. It does not mention Vaishno Devi in Jammu, Mansa Devi and Chandi Devi in Haridwar and Naina Devi in Uttaranchal. There are many others which are not mentioned, but are commonly accepted as Shaktipeeths. I will assign a dubious assertion tag on the list in a few days, if a reputable ref. is not added.

Well, nor can any list be completely right! By custom, usage and tradition many places of Shakti worship are called shakti peethas irrespective of the fact whether such places are mentioned in some

sadhaka, for instance Dakshineswar Kali Temple due to Ramakrishna has become so popular — that people consider such places also as shakti sites. So, the list enumerated here is not exact and exhaustive but definitely not dubious and at the same time only what is normally accepted and given in the Vishuddha Siddhanta Panjika, a Bengali almanac published since 1890. You may add other sites also if you hold any better reference. That’s the beauty of wikipedia! VMO 09:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

i fully accept your argument that no list can be perfectly accurate. But there are temples which are undisputedly accepted as shakti peethas, like the

(♂) 09:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I also do consider with great veneration that Vaishno Devi is a shaktipith. But without going into any controversy as to why and how, the given list is nothing but a list of places where Sati's limbs or ornaments fell on the earth. The sthalapurana of Vaishno Devi does not speak of any such incident and the Page in wikipedia is also silent. That's why perhaps, it was not included in the traditional list! And for being Bengal-centric, I am afraid that the list includes outside countries too. VMO 10:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you afraid. The list only includes places of Ancient India.

(♂) 10:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Its only Bengal centric because Banglapedia has the most reputable source cited on this page.Bakaman _Bakatalk 16:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid that the list includes outside countries too. What's exactly the problem here? The borders of the countries are modern creations, the peethas have been there for hundreds or thousands of years. And Baka is correct to point out why the list sees to be Bengal-centric. Banglapedia IS the most reputable source quoted here (it is a huge print enyclopedia, published by Asiatic Society). --Ragib 16:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:::::Check out the second reference, no.39. It is not mentioned in the main article. I think that web list is much better than relying solely on banglapedia. Though, i am trying to get a better list.

nids may please note that the phrase I am afraid is not used in the sense of fear. It indicates the concernon bringing the question of Bengal-centric in this discussion. The present day boundaries have no relevance as rightly pointed out by Ragib VMO 17:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello friends, right now I am holding an annual number of the Kalyan, Shakti Upasana Ank, published in 1987 and dedicated to the worship of

nids' shall add value to the page by adding appropraite contents. Regards to all. --Bhadani 16:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I am sorry if my comments looked like criticism. I pointed out that the list is wrong becuase i felt so. I am not bumping my workload to others. I will try to find out a better source, but I thought it will be better if I make a comment on the talk page too, so that it comes in the attention of other wikipedians. I also think that we can assign a tag to the list, which will state that the list is not perrfectly accurate. I assume that it can never be because there are multiple place which claim the same ornament of Sati. Like for eyes, there is a temple mentioned in the current list, and there is one in Uttaranchal called Naina Devi. I also think (Personally) that this list varies from one region to other.

(♂) 18:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh, your comments were all right, and the list surely varies from place to place. All interested editors should contribute to make the contents more useful. I also congratulate you on your interest in the matter. I did not mean any offence to you or to any other - we all are friends with a common goal. Regards. --Bhadani 18:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My hearty thanks to Bhadani for tying up the loose ends amicably. Yes, with his keen interest in maintaining wikipedia spirit, he has transformed many issues of thorns into flowers. VMO 03:27, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi to all, I'm new to wikipedia and not much aware of its internals, but as today I went through this article, I found that KangdaDevi temple called 'Vajreshwari Devi temple' near Nagarkot / Pathankot is not listed here and is surely is an undisputed ShaktiPeeth, as per the legend the left breast of sati fell over there and is clearly mentioned in the temple itself and many other sources. Sharma-Shashank (talk) 07:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pithapuram Sri Kukkuteswara Swamy temple is an ancient Siva Khetra in Godavari District. It acquired importance of Buddhists, Jains and Vishnava also. It was the capital of many local dynasties from about 4th or 5th century AD.

Once upon a time Gayasura a powerful a powerful demon was acquired puruhutikashakti which is one among the Asthadasapithas through is great devotion, with that might power he oftenly used to disturb the Yagas of Brahmanas. PithapuramTo over come this trouble the devatas with the help of Trimurthis conceived a plan to kill the Gayasura. According to the plan the devats decided to perform the Yaga on the chest of the Demon, they performed the Yagna with great devotion day and night. On the seventh day of the Yaga, Maheswara himself took the form of Kukkuta ( cook ) and voice, the Gayasura was disturbed from this sleep and immediately the Yaga disturbed. Then the angry Devatas gave a curse to the Demon as the yagna spoiled, his body would also be broken into pieces, the head fell in Gayakshetra, the chest in Jajipuram and the feet in front of Kukkuteswara Swamy temple. The demon Gayasura spread his entire body from Gaya to Pithapuram Kshetra, his feet stretched upto Pithapuram. It became a Padagaya Kshetr SurendrakumarTolem (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kunjapuri is a temple of Goddess Durga, as it is one of the thirteen Shakti Peethas (Shakti Kendras) in the Himalayan Shivalik range and one of the three Shakti Peethas in Tehri Garhwal district, restored by Jagadguru Shankaracharya. The other two Shakti Peeths in the district are Surkanda Devi and Chandrabadni. Kunjapuri, with these two peeths form a sacred triangle. Shakti Peethas are the places where the body parts of Goddess Sati (an incarnation of Goddess Parvati before her birth as Parvati) took place, when Lord Shiva was carrying her dead body in his arms and the body parts of Sati were found in Bharatvarsha. In the Himalaya ranges, he fell at different places in the world, the places where the parts of Maa Sati fell are called places Shaktipeeths. She gave up her body in the fire of Yagya at Haridwar Kankhal when her father Daksha said something about her husband. Derogatory remarks made. Thousands of devotees visit the Durga temple in Kunjapuri throughout the year, but during Navratras there is a huge crowd of devotees. 108 in Devi Bhagwat Purana, 26 in Kalika Purana, 51 in Shivcharitra, 52 in Durga Saptashati and Tantra Chudamani. Generally 51 Shaktipeeths are considered. Asemwal (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What this article needs is relevant text quoted, if possible from Brahmanda Purana, which the article suggests contains the complete listings, all subsequent listing can be verified from Puranic texts, otherwise, there are no many more shrines, on the verge of claiming Shakti Peetha status, and with growing popularity many more will.--Ekabhishek (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The list of shaktipeeths does not include the "Ratanpur – Shri Aadishakti Maa Mahamaya Devi ‘Shaktipeet'" that shall be updated. reference http://www.mysterindia.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=1575 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.242.70.185 (talk) 17:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"

I could not find any references saying that the four mentioned are Adi Shakti Pithas. Kalika Purana lists 4 Pithas (see Vimala_Temple#In_Shakti_Pitha_lists): Vimala Puri, Kamakhya, Jalandhara and Purneshwar. But no proof they are called Adi Shakti Pithas. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927033603/http://www.hindunet.org/saraswati/resources/pithas.htm to http://www.hindunet.org/saraswati/resources/pithas.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://srisailam.co.in/shaktipeethas.
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070303013726/http://www.ramayanainstitute.org/archives/NIU_2001_Conference___Fair/Papers/papers.html to http://www.ramayanainstitute.org/archives/NIU_2001_Conference___Fair/Papers/papers.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130713115630/http://zeenews/ to http://www.zeenews./
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120422030654/http://www.yatra2yatra.com/hinduism/shaktipeeth to http://www.yatra2yatra.com/hinduism/shaktipeeth

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a mistake.Attahas is not situated in Birbhum District .It is situated in BURDWAN,NOW PURBA BARDHAMAN.Attahas Temple is situated near ISHANI RIVER . Skmodak (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• যশোরেশ্বরী কালী মন্দির (ছবি ২০২১).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In Ashta Dasa Shakti Pitha Stotram

So, which would these be? And are they all still existent? Stjohn1970 (talk) 15:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inplace of लाशें, there is should be place word पिंड (parts of body)

देवी सती is honourable for all hindus, sanatan Kmverma2012 (talk) 04:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The word लाशें does not appear in the article. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 13:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect the article from vandalism