Talk:Silver Hill Mine/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ixtal (talk · contribs) 02:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for

ping}} me. I am quite a forgetful editor and it is likely I forgot to get back to you. — ♠Ixtal ( T / C ) Non nobis solum. ♠ 02:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments

Lead+Infobox

  • Infobox image: I would consider editing the Commons image to a cropped version without the margins so that the image is more readable. It would also make it easier to read the names of the various shafts mentioned in the Company section.
    • Fixed. - G

Background

understand.

    • Fixed. - G
  • Same comment about Cabarrus County as above
    • Also fixed. - G

Washington Mining Company

  • each able to smelt a ton of lead - I would say "one" instead of "a" to make it clear you are referring to the measurement rather than the expression "a ton of" meaning "a lot".
    • Fixed. - G
  • In the Philadelphia shipping paragraph you say "lead pigs" and "pig lead" -- is there a difference between the two terms or do they refer to the same thing?
    • Pig lead is the lead that comprises lead pigs. I just dropped the pig from "pig lead" since its not a needed clarification. - G
  • Lead was shipped for processing at Philadelphia. This sentence feels redundant.
    • Dropped it. -G

Zinc and Silver Mining Company

  • have continued the Fall of Petersburg - Continued until?
    • Fixed. - G

Copyright Violations

  • Copyvios Detector detects no likely copyright violations.
    • Ah, let me add some in. - G

General thoughts

Honestly this is a great article. Only very minor things to address. I'll go over the sources now but expect no surprises there. Is there a reason why some of the images in the Kaas source, for example, can't be added to the article as well?

    • Added another image from Kaas, good point. - G
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.