Talk:Stupid (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Untitled

איתן לואין הוא היה הבן אדם הכי שמן בעולם משקלו היה 327

Untitled

If Wikipedia is not a dictionary, is it really necessary to mention the definition of the word in this article?? Georgia guy 00:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC) This is a disambiguation page. It allows people to make sure they go to the page they want to. It's completely necessary.--99.224.26.113 (talk) 19:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that it is necessary. Nobody needs the definition to get to a topic they have in mind. When someone wants the definition they will look it up in the dictionary and only look here for more information if they want it and the definition doesn't add more. If anywhere it belongs in wiktionary. 83.138.172.79 (talk) 20:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History

Looked on the history of this page and it's hilarious, people just add other people to this page, I'd never do such a thing. It's a good thing this page is protected. 87.254.67.181 (talk) 16:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Justin... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.216.166.186 (talk) 05:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 14 April 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

defintion of stupid Fayez Slimkiller2324 (talk) 01:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. –

talk) 03:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move 30 August 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Clear consensus that stupidity is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 03:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. Steel1943 (talk) 16:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Support per nomination. — the Man in Question (in question) 23:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose without evidence per
WP:NOTDICT. — AjaxSmack 03:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Then your best option I would recommend would be to nominate
WP:AFD. Historically, the word "stupid" has the strongest association with the subject in Stupidity. I would have thought that statement was implied in my nomination. Steel1943 (talk) 03:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm not concerned with the
the DAB page. — AjaxSmack 03:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Support
WP:ADJECTIVE adjectives are written as articles at the noun-form name, and therefore frequently redirect that way.. The primary topic of stupid is stupid-the adjective, therefore it should redirect to stupidity. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Support as 67.70 says In ictu oculi (talk) 20:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per the IP - "Stupid" is far far more known as Stupidity than anything else. –Davey2010^Talk 22:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clear primary topic of the term. bd2412 T 14:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Stupid refers to stupidity. Clear PrimaryTopic. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.