Talk:Svetlana Kuznetsova/GA4

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 14:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this soon.--
WP:FOUR) 14:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

~~The copyeditor removed a ton of non-breaking spaces ( ), especially in world rankings. This puzzles me.~~--
WP:FOUR) 11:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Reinserted.--
_T ^C _N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

~~All images need {{~~

WP:FOUR) 04:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

] Done--_T^C_N 16:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] The following issues seem to remain unresolved from GA2 by reviewer WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It would be nice to have a relationships section.--WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I would be nice but it is not possible to make one. Kuznetsova had no affairs.--_T^C_N 08:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] "Kuznetsova's win over World No. 11 Anastasia Myskina in the second round of the Pacific Life Open in Indian Wells, California was her first over a top-10 player this year" - World No. 11, top-10 player? --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC). Reiterate now.--WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done Was it her highest ranked opponent victory to date? If so this is better than first top 20 of the year.--WP:FOUR) 13:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] No, that was not her highest. She once defeated top-ranked _T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I asked "highest ranked opponent victory to date", meaning to that date.--WP:FOUR) 15:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] "Kuznetsova's came at Wimbledon" - what's missing? --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC). Still seems ungrammatical.--WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done "At the doubles, they were defeated ..." - who? --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC). Still don't know who her doubles partner was.--WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] "she paired with Martina Navratilova, with whom she would later play throughout the year " Change they to "she and Navratilova".--WP:FOUR) 13:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] _T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] And "At..." or "In ..."? Please check this right through the article. A long time ago, a French teacher told me prepositions are the hardest thing to master in 2nd languages. --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC) Given wimbledon example above, I reiterate this.--WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I am pretty sure it is "at the doubles". Also I think you can say both "at Wimbledon" or "in Wimbledon", but I am not a native speaker... See if you can encourage the copyeditor to continue and finish up by the end of the month.--WP:FOUR) 15:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] SK played in the womens' and mixed doubles in Paris. --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC) searching the word mixed yields no results.--WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done SK played in the womens' and mixed doubles in Wimbledon. --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC) searching the word mixed yields no results.--WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Thanks, done Add mixed doubles summary to infobox. If she has any significant wins add it to WP:FOUR) 13:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] She only played in 2003 as far as I can see; I added her best results--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] WP:LEAD Add grand slam doubles wins to LEAD.--WP:FOUR) 13:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Already in the first paragraph.--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] State when she first appeared in a grand slam?--WP:FOUR) 13:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2004, as stated in the second para.--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] That says first grand slam win. You say her first major tournament appearance but not first grand slam.--WP:FOUR) 16:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done.--_T^C_N 16:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Is it normal to state when she was seeded for the first time in a tournament? grand slam?--WP:FOUR) 13:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I don't think this is needed.--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] State when she became highest ranked (#2, I believe), how long she held this rank, and if notable, which tournament propelled her to that rank.--WP:FOUR) 13:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It says "As a result,..:"--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Can you say how long she was at the #2 rank.--WP:FOUR) 16:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Stated.--_T^C_N 16:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I thought these are weekly rankings. Saying she dropped the following season is confusing to me.--WP:FOUR) 17:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Exactly, so I removed it. Tennis player drop and climb all the time.--_T^C_N 18:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I think it is still reasonable to add length of time (in weeks) at her peak ranking in both singles and doubles. It is important.--WP:FOUR) 11:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Same for doubles.--WP:FOUR) 13:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I don't see highest rank and such.--WP:FOUR) 16:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] The infobox already contains this info, so I think this is redundant.--_T^C_N 16:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] The LEAD is never considered redundant with the infobox.--WP:FOUR) 17:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It should probably say she has reached the finals of each grand slam at least once, winning the Australian twice.--WP:FOUR) 13:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I think the first paragraph is summarizing this already.--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It should clearly state each finals.--WP:FOUR) 16:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 16:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Now "She has reached the finals of each grand slam at least once, winning the Australian twice" needs to have "as a doubles player" at the beginning or end.--WP:FOUR) 16:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 18:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It is not clear to me what her mixed doubles summary will be like. Maybe a sentence like she occasionally played mixed doubles, but has had no significant results might be applicable.--WP:FOUR) 13:34, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] If you could add her career record, it would be clear to the reader that she did not play this event often.--WP:FOUR) 16:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I think the infobox already states this things.--_T^C_N 16:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It shows she never did that well. It does not document that she did not play that often. (I meant to add this detail to the infobox).--WP:FOUR) 16:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] The infobox is already very large.--_T^C_N 18:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] "Pairing with Elena Likhovtseva she climbed to No. 3 WTA in doubles and never broke her record." - it seems like this sentence belongs in the next paragraph and I am not sure what record you are talking about.--WP:FOUR) 11:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Reworded and moved--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] "and never broke this record" should probably be something like, "which remains her career-high" You need to add Open to Australian and link it on first use.--WP:FOUR) 11:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Linked--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Note: I have been making copy edits to the beginning of the article (Lead, Early life, Career: 2000, 2001-2002 and 2003) to assist GoP in his efforts but realize that TonyTheTiger is now conducting his review. To prevent further risk of our edits & review getting their wires crossed I'll wait until the outcome of the review before making any further edits. Two final observations for GoP: there are a few deadlinks and the subsection "Playing Style" does not belong in the "Off-Court" section.--Wolbo (talk) 14:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] If your copyedit will take less than a week or so, I would prefer if you complete it before I finish my review.--WP:FOUR) 15:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] (2x ce) Thanks for your copyedits. I will fix these issues. Regards.--_T^C_N 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I have expanded the playing style, fixed the dead links and formatted the last sections.--_T^C_N 15:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] TTT, I think it would probably be best if I finish my 'non-review review/copyedit' and it should not take long at all, certainly not a week. GoP, is that OK with you or do you want to proceed directly with the GA review? As you are the one who requested the GA review I'll leave the choice up to you.--Wolbo (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] Well, I am a participant at _T^C_N 16:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] The copyeditor was already ahead of where I am in the article. I am still working on the LEAD. Even without a copyedit, I am not sure this would pass within the next week. I have not looked at /GA3 and have only read the LEAD other than look at /GA2. Are these your only potential points?--WP:FOUR) 17:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I have _T^C_N 17:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Try to get your points with Redding. I am not sure this one will make it.--WP:FOUR) 18:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Finalized my review and (significant) copy edit session. --Wolbo (talk) 23:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] 2000 ITF Junior Career "Kuznetsova was ranked in the top 900, receiving her first ranking of 889" when?--WP:FOUR) 22:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] When she defeated her opponent--_T^C_N 08:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] You have never said when she appeared "In Minsk, Belarus". If I understand rankings correctly, they are dated as of the end of a specific week. I am asking you to say something like "receiving her first ranking of 889 during the week ending Month DD, YYYY", after adding the date of the tournament.--WP:FOUR) 11:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2001–2002 "the Waikoloa Championships in Waikoloa, Hawaii" Either just discuss the first one or give dates for both.--WP:FOUR) 22:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Completely redundant.--_T^C_N 08:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] By your response, I presume the second tournament was also in May, which is not clear in the text. Pleas fix this.--WP:FOUR) 11:23, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] "However, she lost in the qualifying rounds of both the French Open and Wimbledon." - clarify that this was previously and unpipe the tournament years.--WP:FOUR) 22:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Can you explain what "unpipe" means? Done the first.--_T^C_N 08:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] You have piped WP:FOUR) 11:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2003 "Kuznetsova participated at Wimbledon, where in the fourth round, she defeated Maria Sharapova to reach her first Grand Slam quarterfinal". What was Sharapova ranked/seeded at the time?--WP:FOUR) 22:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 08:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It seems that the copyedit stops here. Please seek the copyeditor to resume. The article will not pass without a copyedit. I don't wish to continue reviewing the rest until it has been copyedited.--WP:FOUR) 22:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Could you be more specific? The copyeditor copyedited the whole article, by the way.--_T^C_N 08:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] As noted above, if win over Anastasia Myskina was the best of her career at that date say so.--WP:FOUR) 11:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] What about Anne Kremer the year before?--WP:FOUR) 15:38, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It states that she won over a top-20 player--_T^C_N 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] How can they both be her first win over a top 20 opponent.--WP:FOUR) 14:53, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Corrected.--_T^C_N 18:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Getting back to my original concern, is this the highest ranked opponent that she had beaten up to that point in her career. If this was her 2nd victory over a top 20 opponent, then it had to be.--WP:FOUR) 23:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2004 You seem to be linking and fully naming people already mentioned in recent years above.--WP:FOUR) 11:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] "for her first win over a top 10 player." - wins.--WP:FOUR) 11:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Given that I misread Williams as #1, it should be win. You were correct before.--WP:FOUR) 16:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Why were there two number 1's? Is this an error?--WP:FOUR) 11:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] If you mean Dubai then it states that Williams was a former #1--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] surprise is POV.--WP:FOUR) 11:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Removed--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2005 "Kuznetsova reached the quarterfinals of for her second time before losing to top seed Davenport." seems ungrammatical.--WP:FOUR) 11:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Reworded--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] rm "in a shock defeat"--WP:FOUR) 11:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Removed--_T^C_N 12:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2006 donated?--WP:FOUR) 15:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Removed--_T^C_N 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Did the back-to-back wins improve her world ranking?--WP:FOUR) 15:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Removed as incorrect.--_T^C_N 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2007 "Reaching the final improved her ranking to third, a career high" please provide the week of this ranking.--WP:FOUR) 15:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] What do you mean? She simply improved the ranking after winning. --_T^C_N 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] This is the same issue as in 2000 above. Some readers will want to know which week she attained this ranking.--WP:FOUR) 15:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done I think--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] "As a result of this run, Kuznetsova reached World No. 2." provide the week for this one too.--WP:FOUR) 15:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] What do you mean? She simply improved the ranking after winning. --_T^C_N 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] This is the same issue as in 2000 above. Some readers will want to know which week she attained this ranking.--WP:FOUR) 15:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done I think--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It seems that there might have been a tournament or two where she was ranked as the number 1 seed. It would be interesting to point out any such instances.--WP:FOUR) 15:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] There might be some, but I really don't see how it is notable and I removed many minor tournaments per the second GAN.--_T^C_N 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Isn't it a big deal to be the #1 seed in a Tier I tournament (for the first time)?--WP:FOUR) 15:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I added some seeding information--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Did you find one that is described as her first number one seed.--WP:FOUR) 19:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 14:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] By what standards, is this WP:FOUR) 15:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Do you mean wtatennis.com? This is the official site of WTA which archives all the scores in the past and present.--_T^C_N 18:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] You just need to present a WP:FOUR) 23:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Added ref--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Detail all the #1 players while she was number 2.--WP:FOUR) 16:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Only Henin was number-one.--_T^C_N 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] State who was #1 in the text.--WP:FOUR) 15:05, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2008 "After the latter loss, she dropped out of the top five in the world rankings for the first time in two years." Was this when she fell from #2? Say when she fell from number two and how many weeks the stay lasted.--WP:FOUR) 15:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2009 Did she ever reach #2 during the year?--WP:FOUR) 15:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I looked at the player statistics, but she never reached #2 that year.--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I presume you also made sure that she went down from #3 rather than up in 2010.--WP:FOUR) 19:53, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I am not sure what you mean.--_T^C_N 14:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] She ended the year at #3. You said you checked if during the year she was ever #2. Which means you checked before the time when we have documented that she was #3. Did you check after the time to see if she rose from #3 to #2?--WP:FOUR) 16:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] She never achived a better result than #2. She became worse and worse until her fail in the French Open, dropping from #6 to #20.--_T^C_N 18:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Do you mean she never achieved better than #3 after 2009? You said #2.--WP:FOUR) 16:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] She never achived #2 except in 2007--_T^C_N 17:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2010 losing to No. 19 Petrova (world or seed)--WP:FOUR) 15:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Seed. Done--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] As the top seed due to Serena Williams and Safina's withdrawal (it would be nice to know if this was the first time or when the first time was)--WP:FOUR) 15:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Added--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] ]Andrea Petkovic typo--WP:FOUR) 15:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Fixed--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] O.K. but this remains one of many redundant links in the article. She was just linked in the prior year.--WP:FOUR) 19:55, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I delinked many links.--_T^C_N 14:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] In this section you finally present a lot of seeding info. However, it is inconsistent with earlier sections although I like the added detail.--WP:FOUR) 15:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I will try to add more seeding information in the previous sections.--_T^C_N 16:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] For a woman who spent 27 weeks of her career as the number 2 ranked player in the world, but never was number 1, I think it is important to attempt to point out her first and last number 1 seed and a count of number 1 seeds if possible.--WP:FOUR) 19:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done. First was in Bali, 2006; last was in New Haven, 2009.--_T^C_N 14:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] What is the source for this?--WP:FOUR) 16:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] From [1]--_T^C_N 18:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] You need to present that source to the reader at the point in the article where you say it was the first/last time.--WP:FOUR) 23:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2011 "She fell to Peng Shuai in the second, although initially up a set." in the second round?--WP:FOUR) 16:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 18:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] The match was the longest recorded women's Grand Slam match in the Open Era, with a final scoreline of 6–4, 1–6, 16–14, and the second-longest women's match in the Open Era. - I think there is a link for longest matches and some have articles.--WP:FOUR) 16:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 18:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] but was defeated by wildcard Christina McHale in two tie-breaks. - in the second round?--WP:FOUR) 16:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 18:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] 2012 Did she play doubles at the French.--WP:FOUR) 23:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] No--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Fed Cup "Likhovtseva (with Kuznetsova) in doubles" - parenthesis is not needed.--WP:FOUR) 23:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] You overpiped WP:FOUR) 23:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Same with 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2011. suddenly 57th?--WP:FOUR) 23:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Is a "a straight victory" tennis lingo I do not know?--WP:FOUR) 23:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Coaches regular appearance -> regular guest.--WP:FOUR) 04:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Appearances in video games This section needs to be beefed up. Maybe it can be expanded by merger. Does she have any prominent endorsements? Does she do anything else notable off the court?--WP:FOUR) 04:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Split controversies from Endorsements and popular culture.--WP:FOUR) 16:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 17:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Your hard work gives me confidence that this review might succeed in a short period of time. I am officially putting this on hold.--WP:FOUR) 04:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Thanks--_T^C_N 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Review of progress I would still like clarification on which weeks she was #3 in doubles in order to show how many weeks she was ranked #3.--WP:FOUR) 18:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] How about now?--_T^C_N 18:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] As before, please specifically identify the weeks she rose to and fell from her highest rank. In this case, I think you need two pairs of dates. This will give us a total of number of weeks at her highest rank.--WP:FOUR) 19:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Now?--_T^C_N 19:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I count 8 weeks at number 3 (7 consecutive) not 5. You are correct. Done. Now, I want to go back and check her singles and see that we did not include the final week's date for her #2 singles ranking.--WP:FOUR) 19:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I counted 15 weeks--_T^C_N 20:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Please present a ranking date for her fall from #2 so that it is easy to verify the 15 weeks.--WP:FOUR) 21:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done--_T^C_N 11:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Two issues. 1.) I count 24 weeks if she fell in the week of February 24. 2.) Oddly she attained #2 on a Sunday and you say she lost the ranking on a Monday. Don't those come out on a regular cycle (the same day every week)?--WP:FOUR) 14:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I don't know, sorry. --_T^C_N 14:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Rankings are always published on Mondays, reflecting the results of the prior week.--Wolbo (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] I would like clarification if the victory over Anastasia Myskina in 2003 was the best (highest opponent) up to that point in her career.--WP:FOUR) 18:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I stated that it was her highest up to that point.--_T^C_N 18:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] No you stated it was her highest that year, but not the highest up to that point.--WP:FOUR) 19:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Done.--_T^C_N 19:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Optimally, I would like to see a relationships section.--WP:FOUR) 18:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] The third point is not a dealbreaker.--WP:FOUR) 18:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I am also not pressing for a mixed doubles record.--WP:FOUR) 21:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Great work. Good Luck in the WP:FOUR) 18:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

~~Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Svetlana_Kuznetsova/GA4&oldid=1051730375"~~