Talk:TNA Triple Crown

Object. The existing triple crown article is already long and cluttered.

Shouldn`t the TNA Triple Crown be considered as what happened only in TNA. I think that if you win the X Division Championship and won the other 2 NWA before they were considered as a TNA title. --Soopafred 05:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, if you won the X-Division Title, then you should have won the NWA World Heavyweight Title and NWA World Tag Team Titles in TNA in order to be a Triple Crown Winner in TNA, not if you won those titles before they became exclusive to TNA on June 19, 2002.--MC511 14:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need a seperate article for the TNA Triple Crown? The size of this article is practically the same size as the TNA bit of the Triple Crown article that we already have. Not to mentiont that the regular article for the TNA area is more up-to-date than this article. I move we merge this article with the Triple Crown Champion article that we already have. If someone can add in the suggest merge tags, that'd be great. I don't know what they are. Anakinjmt 04:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The existing Triple Crown article is long and cluttered, includes fictional accomplishments and has an incomplete listing of potential future TNA Triple Crown winners. 84.13.140.190 01:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that long or cluttered, and there is no point in having a separate TNA article for this when there is a TNA section in the normal article. And, don't take out the propose merge tags just because YOU disagree with them. Please make any further comments on the talk page for Triple Crown Champion. Thank you. Anakinjmt 02:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]