Talk:The Financial Express (India)
Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
India Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Journalism Mid‑importance | |||
Addressing issues with article
3 issues are mentioned in a Mar'15 review, but the discussion seems unavailable on the talk page.
- This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (March 2015)
- This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (March 2015)
- This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2015)
All 3 issues still seem to exist in the article, which needs a comprehensive rewrite to comply with AD and CS. Does anyone have relevant background for the same? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.1.208.98 (talk) 11:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello sir i have important talk with you Tenzing karma Tamang (talk) 15:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 6 September 2018
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved (
- Comment: It should be noted that the page The Financial Express previously listed the Indian newspaper before it was disambiguated by User:Kmzayeem without discussion. Gotitbro (talk) 15:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment isn't improving the article more of a priority? In ictu oculi (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – The disambiguation page has been stable for 5 years, so we are not talking about reverting a recent undiscussed move. Both newspapers are notable enough, and both articles should be expanded anyway. Status quo looks fine. — JFG talk 10:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have added {{Distinguish}} hatnotes on both articles, to help readers. — JFG talk 10:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - I agree with above users that primary concerns should be disambiguation and expansion of both the articles.--Politicoindian (talk) 00:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.