Talk:Theirs Is the Glory

Military history: War films / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	War films task force
	World War II task force

Removal of "needs infobox" tag

This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Apparently this article was moved from Theirs is the Glory to Theirs Is the Glory in 2007 as per WP:CAPS, but I don't see anything there that would apply to this example. The first version is correct, as per the name on the DVD cover for this film, so I've redirected it back to here. Ranger Steve (talk) 19:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move proposal

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Theirs is the Glory → Theirs Is the Glory – "Theirs Is the Glory" is the IMDb title. --Bensin (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Support. Ridiculous as it may seem, a google news archive search shows that the "Is" is capitalised in the majority of reliable sources. So support per
WP:COMMONNAME. Jenks24 (talk) 18:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
As a note, we generally don't follow IMDb's naming conventions as IMDb is not considered a
reliable source. Jenks24 (talk) 18:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Support- Filmmaker's provided memorial site also has 'Is', and although not independent, much better justification than IMDb. Dru of Id (talk) 19:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copyright status

I have deleted the link to the illicit hosting of this British film on Internet Archive. Co-writer Terence Young did not die until 1994, so UK copyright subsists until the end of 2064. As a non-US film still under copyright in its country of origin on 1 January 1996, it is protected in the US for 95 years after publication, so to the end of 2049. Nick Cooper (talk) 20:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]